Search Results for "inaccurate particulars"

90 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Penalty Case for Wrongful DTAA Claim — No Concealment Found. Assessee's Bonafide Belief That India-China DTAA Applied to Hong Kong Based on Official Document Precludes Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The revenue appealed against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which set aside the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Revenue Appeal Against ITAT Order Deleting Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2006-07 Due to Defective Notice; Questions Validity of Penalty Initiation Despite Retrospective Amendment to Section 271(1B)

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, arose from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, which had allowed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Concealment of Income in Land Sale Transaction. Assessee failed to disclose receipt of advance sale consideration in return, leading to penalty for concealment.

The appellant-assessee, along with four others, executed an agreement for sale of a plot of land at Vasai on 07.12.2004 for a total consideration of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be imposed for mere disallowance of claim without finding of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars.

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 29.12.2016, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147(a) for Income Tax on Minimum Guarantee Receipts from Film Sale. Assessee's Failure to Disclose Full Consideration for Sale of Movie 'Charas' Justifies Reassessment Despite Partial Acceptance of Addition.

The case involves an income tax reference at the instance of the assessee, who sold a movie titled 'Charas' to M/s. Prakash Pictures on a minimum guar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for Concealment of Income in Income Tax Reference. Minimum penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 sustained for suppression of net profit of Rs.9,11,521/-.

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from proceedings for the Assessment Year 1987-8...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Tribunal's concurrent findings on non-concealment of income and non-furnishing of inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld.

The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Tribunal's Order Upheld for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for alleged concealment of income was deleted by the Tribunal on finding no deliberate concealment.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Deletion Upheld for Bonafide Claims. Claims for deduction under Section 35D and diminution in value of shares were bonafide and not concealment, following CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appel...