Search Results for "illicit intercourse"

109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age of Victim and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 366A, 344, 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anil S/o Bhayrappa Khairav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, FTSC-I (POCSO), Vijayapura, in Special Case (POCSO) No.15/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 3/4 of POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove penetrative sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kishor Shankar Palve, was convicted by the Special Court and Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, for offences under Section 3 punish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rudresh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Chitradurga in S.C.No.23/2011 for offences under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 363, 366(A), 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Maula s/o Babu Kotwal, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad in Special (POCSO) Case No.21 of 2015 for offences under Sections ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Prafulla Vinayak Nage and Atul Shrikrishna Bhadake, under Section 376(2)(g) (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal and Sets Aside Divorce Decree in Adultery Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Interested Witnesses. Husband's Allegations of Wife's Illicit Relationship with Three Named Persons Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 13(1)(i) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant-wife challenged the judgment of the Family Court, Akola, dated 17.06.2013, which granted a decree of divorce to the respondent-husband u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Wife and Co-Respondent, Upholds Divorce Decree on Grounds of Adultery, Desertion, and Cruelty Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Wife's Voluntary Sexual Intercourse with Co-Respondent and Desertion Established by Preponderance of Probabilities.

The case involves two family court appeals arising from a divorce petition filed by Sushil (husband) against Sangeeta (wife) under Section 13(1)(i), (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Uncle for Rape of Minor Niece in Rape Case — Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient. The court confirmed 12 years RI under Section 376 IPC for repeated sexual assault on a 15-year-old girl entrusted to his care.

The appellant, Tulshiram Babasaheb Mulik, an ex-military man employed as a watchman, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Was Inconsistent with Medical Report and Circumstances.

The appellant, Rattan Suka Lilke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for offences under Section 366 read with Section 34 IPC and ...