Section 6 Specific Relief Act – Proof of Possession Mandatory.
5 Mar 2026This case arose from a dispute over possession of a dispensary premises in Mumbai between family members. The plaintiffs claimed that they were in set...
Search Results for "illegal dispossession"
154 result(s) found
Found 154 result(s)
High Court
High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Possession Dispute - Applicant Challenge to Decree Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act Fails - Trial Court's Order Restoring Possession Upheld
27 Feb 2026The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Application filed by the Applicant-Defendant challenging the Trial Court's decree in Special Civil Suit No...
- 620
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application in Property Dispute Over Succession Certificate — Held That Succession Certificate Is Not Necessary for Claiming Title by Adverse Possession or Will. The court clarified that a succession certificate under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is not a prerequisite for filing a suit for declaration of title based on a Will or adverse possession, and that the Civil Court has jurisdiction to decide such matters.
14 Nov 2025The case involves two cross civil revision applications arising from a property dispute between Maharukh Mediomah Patel (applicant in CRA/64/2021) and...
- 144
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Validly Taken Under Section 10(6) of ULC Act, 1976. Act of Court Should Not Injure Suitor; Repeal of ULC Act in 2008 Vests Land in Appellant.
3 Mar 2025The appellant, M/S A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation (now ECE Industries Limited), owned land in Fatehnagar Village, Rangareddy District, Telangan...
- 641
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Declaring Abatement of ULC Proceedings and Non-Vesting of Land Under Repeal Act. Landowner's Surplus Land Declaration Under Sections 8(4), 9, and 10 of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 Held to Have Abated as Physical Possession Not Taken Before Repeal Act Came Into Force.
13 Sep 2019The petitioner, Smt. Tarabai Tulshiram Meshram, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that all proceedings under Sections 9 and 10 of the Urban ...
- 97
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.
7 Aug 2019The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...
- 215
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act — Petitioners Guilty of Suppression of Facts. Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Rejected as Petitioners Had Received Compensation and Suppressed Earlier Proceedings.
24 Nov 2015The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the acquisition of their lands b...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Society's Possession Claim in Tenant Copartnership Housing Society Dispute — Transfer of Flat Without Consent Invalid Under Bye-Laws and Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The court held that the petitioner, claiming through an invalid transfer, is in illegal occupation and liable to be evicted.
7 Jul 2015The writ petition was filed by Tedco Exports Pvt. Ltd. challenging the order of the Maharashtra State Cooperative Appellate Court which allowed the ap...
- 284
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Court Receiver Appointed to Protect Suit Premises Pending Trial. Dispute Involves Alleged Illegal Dispossession of Widow and Minor Son from Residential Flat and Office Premises by In-Laws.
9 Oct 2012The appeal arises from a suit filed by Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan and her minor son Raghib Ibrahim Khan (appellants) against Asadullah Khan and others (re...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Prior Possession and Dispossession Within Six Months. Court Held That Summary Suit Under Section 6 Cannot Be Used to Decide Title and Requires Strict Proof of Possession and Unlawful Dispossession.
4 May 2012The plaintiffs, including Amod Nandkishore Mehra and others, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of pos...
- 60
