Search Results for "hosiery scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "hosiery scheme"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Hawkers' Petitions in Street Vending Act Case Due to Compliance with Statutory Framework. Town Vending Committee Actions Upheld as Lawful Under Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014, Addressing Hawkers' Livelihood Concerns.

23 Mar 2026

The background of the dispute involved several hawkers' unions and individual hawkers filing writ petitions against the Town Vending Committee, Munici...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Rejecting MSMED Act Jurisdiction Bar. The court held that Section 18(4) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 does not bar a Section 11 application unless a reference is made to the Facilitation Council, and appointed an arbitrator as per the arbitration clause in the agreement.

9 Feb 2026

The dispute arose from a 'Bizom Customer Agreement' dated 21.02.2023 between the petitioner and respondent, containing an arbitration clause (clause 1...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Returned Candidate in Karnataka Legislative Council Election Dispute — Nominated Members' Voting Rights Upheld. The Court held that nominated councillors under Section 352(1)(b) of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 are entitled to vote, reversing the High Court's decision that had set aside the election.

1 Jan 2026

The case pertains to the election to the Karnataka Legislative Council from the 12-Chikkamagaluru Local Authorities Constituency held in 2021. The con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Rejection of Discharge in MPID Act Case – Alleged Fraudulent Hosiery Scheme – No Discharge as Prima Facie Case Exists

2 May 2025

The appellant, Smt. Neelam Rajendra Nanaware, filed a criminal appeal under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Fin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses NOIDA's Appeals Against Quashing of Land Acquisition Notifications and Compensation Direction. Acquisition Notifications Quashed Due to Illegal Dispensation of Section 5A Inquiry Under Section 17 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

5 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) against the Allahabad High Court's judgment quashing land ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Quashing Charge Memo Due to Delay and Quasi-Judicial Functions. The Court Held That Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After 8 Years for Acts Done in Discharge of Official Duties as Income Tax Officer Were Unjustified and Caused Prejudice to the Employee.

13 Feb 2013

The Union of India and others filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Central Admini...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demand Notices Under Mathadi Act — Unprotected Worker Defined as Manual Worker in Scheduled Employment. Direct Employment Does Not Exclude Coverage Under Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969.

3 Mar 2006

The Bombay High Court addressed two writ petitions challenging demand notices issued under the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and Other Manual Workers (Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Validity of TUFS Guidelines and Export Obligation Extension Policy. Court upholds Textile Commissioner's power to impose conditions for extension of export obligation period under Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (TUFS) and holds that guidelines are not ultra vires the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by textile exporters challenging the validity of guidelines issued by the Textile Commissioner under t...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)