Search Results for "hired labour"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "hired labour"

144 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contract Labourers in SAIL Mines Despite Finding Contract Genuine. High Court's Direction for Regularisation Consideration Under Para 125 of SAIL Judgment Affirmed, Back Wages Denied.

5 Jul 2019

The case involves a long-standing industrial dispute between the Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL), a government undertaking, and the Ispat Khadan ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Award for Regularisation of Contract Workers in KPCL — Denies Back Wages. The court held that contract workers performing perennial work under direct supervision are entitled to regularisation under Section 10(1)(c) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but back wages are not automatic.

31 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Kirujala Vidyut Yojana (Contractor Karmik Sangh), a union representing 27 workmen, filed a writ petition challenging the award dated 0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Casual Labourer Challenging Termination Without Inquiry. Services of monthly-rated casual labourer without temporary status can be terminated without holding disciplinary inquiry.

12 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Rajendra Kashinath Badgujar, was appointed as a casual labourer in the Central Railway, Manmad, with effect from 23rd December 1987. H...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Deliberates on Employment Status of Contract Workers in Statutory Canteens Under Factories Act. The Court Examines Whether Workers Engaged by Contractor to Run Canteen Required Under Section 46 Are Deemed Employees of Principal Employer.

1 Aug 2026

The appeals arose from a dispute over the employment status of casual workers employed by a contractor to run a canteen at Air India's premises. The c...

High Court

High Court Allows Compensation Appeal Under Employees' Compensation Act -- Temporary Driver Hiring Establishes Employer-Employee Relationship -- Labour Commissioner's Order Reversed

18 Feb 2026

The High Court allowed an appeal challenging the Labour Commissioner's rejection of a compensation claim under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923. ...

High Court

High Court Upholds Award Directing Absorption of Contract Workers as Permanent Employees. Tribunal's Finding of Sham Contract Upheld as Workers Were Directly Supervised and Paid by Principal Employer Under CLRA Act, 1970.

17 Feb 2016

The Airports Authority of India (AAI), a statutory body, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Award dated 26 Ma...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

28 Feb 2006

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Workmen Held Not Employees of Respondent. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that the 21 persons named in the complaint were not employees of the respondent, as the respondent had ceased business and the workmen were employed by third parties.

5 Jul 2005

The petitioner, Maharashtra General Kamgar Mahasangh, a trade union, filed a complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Preventio...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Bank's Challenge to Reinstatement and Regularisation of Daily-Wage Workers in Industrial Disputes Act Case — Upholds Tribunal's Finding of Illegal Termination. CGIT Award Directing Reinstatement with 30% Backwages and Regularisation Under Section 25F Not Interfered as Workers Completed 240 Days of Service and Termination Was in Violation of Statutory Provisions.

12 Dec 2025

The writ petition challenged an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-II, Mumbai, which had directed reinstatement and regularisation of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Gratuity Orders Against IIT Bombay in Contract Labour Case — Principal Employer Liable Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. IIT Bombay held liable for gratuity of contract labourers despite absence of direct employer-employee relationship, as the definition of 'employer' under Section 2(f) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 includes the person who has ultimate control over the affairs of the establishment.

4 Oct 2024

The Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay (IIT Bombay) filed three writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Autho...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)