Search Results for "high tension tower"

12 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Intra-Court Appeal in High Tension Tower Erection Dispute on Patta Land. Court Directs Landowner to Seek Compensation Under Section 16(3) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, Upholding Public Interest in Essential Services over Private Land Objections.

The dispute arose from the proposed erection of a high tension tower on patta land belonging to the appellant, Jaya Santhi, in Sethupattu Village, Tir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Municipal Permission Case — Withdrawal of Permission for Body Building Competition Held Arbitrary. Model Code of Conduct Cannot Be Used to Revoke Already Granted Permission Without Justification.

The petitioner, Vijay Jagannath Salvi, a social worker, sought to organize a Body Building Competition at Late Jayanta Nathu Devlekar ground. The Kaly...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Rental Compensation for Transmission Towers Erected in 1981 Without Consent or Compensation. Landowners entitled to compensation under Section 10(d) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 read with Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for continued use of land.

The petitioners, eight landowners from Ashiv and Wangi villages in Latur district, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order dated 04.07.2018...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The State of Goa filed an appeal against the judgment and final order dated 11.12.2017 passed by the Sessions Court, South Goa at Margao in Sessions C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Technical Disqualification in Tender for Deep Water Surveys. Bid Evaluation Criteria Requiring Minimum 850 Meters Depth Experience Upheld as Reasonable and Not Arbitrary.

The petitioner, Coastal Marine Construction & Engineering Limited, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging th...