Search Results for "hedging"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "hedging"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

29 May 2026

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Derivative Transaction Dispute. Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails as Award Not Patently Illegal or Perverse.

29 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 6 July 2012 dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition by Deutsche Bank Against Finolex Industries Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 — Disputed Derivative Transaction Debt Precludes Summary Winding-Up. Court Holds That Winding-Up Petition Is Not a Debt Recovery Mechanism and Dismisses Petition with Costs.

28 Mar 2014

The judgment arises from a Company Petition filed by Deutsche Bank AG, Mumbai Branch, seeking winding-up of Finolex Industries Limited under Section 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Society Elections — Petitioners Failed to Establish Violation of Statutory Provisions or Bye-laws. The court held that disputes relating to cooperative society elections must be raised under Section 39-A of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959, and the writ petition is not maintainable in view of the alternative remedy.

14 Nov 2025

The petitioners, four individuals who are members of Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara Sangha Niyamita (VSNN), a cooperative society, filed a writ petition befo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bye-Election to Fill Casual Vacancy in Katol Assembly Constituency. Section 151A of Representation of the People Act, 1951 Mandates Filling Casual Vacancy Within Six Months, and the Election Schedule Complies with the Statutory Time Limit.

12 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Sandeep Yashwantrao Sarode, Chairman of Panchayat Samiti, Katol, and Director of Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol, filed a ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Bombay Tenancy Act Case — Deemed Purchase on Tillers' Day Upheld Despite Landlord's Minority. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 31 Having Been Rejected, Tenant Is Deemed Purchaser Under Section 32 Read with Section 29 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

12 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the tenant, Bayaji Sambhu Mali @ Borate (through LRs), against the judgment of the High Court which had...

High Court

Special Court at Bombay Allows Recovery Suit Against Notified Person Under Special Court Act, 1992 — Custodian's Claim for Notified Property Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Tainted Transaction. The court held that the suit for recovery of Rs. 6 Crores is maintainable and the Custodian failed to prove that the property is notified property under Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.

31 Jan 2019

The plaintiffs, Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta, Shri Ashwin S. Mehta, and M/s. ZEST Holdings Pvt. Ltd., filed Special Court Suit No. 1 of 2017 before the Special...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)