Search Results for "hafta"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Single Offence Against Individual. Single Incident of Assault on Individual Does Not Constitute Threat to Public Order, Detention Order Set Aside.

The petitioner, Gopal Suresh Malik, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 24th August 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case for Pharmaceutical Freebies. Expenses on Gifting Freebies to Medical Practitioners Are Deductible Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961, as Indian Medical Council Regulations Only Prohibit Acceptance, Not Gifting, Under Explanation 1.

The dispute involved a pharmaceutical company, referred to as Apex, appealing against a High Court judgment that upheld orders disallowing part of its...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Accused Contends Non-Proof of Bribe Demand and Admission of Loan Repayment by Complainant.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 29.03.2005 in Special Case No.26/2003 passed by the Special Judge at Aurangabad, convicting the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 161 IPC set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony uncorroborated.

The appellant, Shridhar Ramkrushna Fale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Policemen and Private Citizen in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) and Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony uncorroborated.

The case involves two appeals against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants in Criminal Appeal No.248/02 were police...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Non-Compliance with Section 56 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 — In-Camera Statements Not Recorded as Required. Failure to Record In-Camera Statements and Lack of Material in Show-Cause Notice Regarding Witnesses' Fear Renders Externment Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Bilal Gulam Rasul Patel, challenged an externment order dated 15th April, 2013 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Thane, externi...