Search Results for "gutka prohibition"

14 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Ban on Transport of Banned Food Products Through Maharashtra. Inter-State Transport of Banned Products Not Prohibited Under Section 30(2)(a) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The petitioners, including the driver, cleaner, owner of a truck, and a transporter, challenged an order dated 15/7/2020 issued by the Food Safety Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010159832015_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Food Adulteration Cases Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedures Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Failure to Follow Section 47 and Rule 2.4.2 of the Manual of Procedures Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, through a common judgment, allowed three criminal writ petitions challenging the validity of criminal proceedings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings for Possession of Gutka for Sale Under Section 273 IPC — Gutka Not an Article of Food. Possession of Gutka for sale does not constitute an offence under Section 273 IPC as Gutka is not an article of food under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The case involves two criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioners, who were accused of possessing Gutka for sale, which was alleged to be an offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Ban on Gutka and Pan Masala in Navi Mumbai - No Statutory Prohibition Found. Court Refuses to Direct Police to Ban Sale of Gutka and Pan Masala in Absence of Any Law Prohibiting Such Sale.

The petitioner, Rahul S. Thakur, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to the Commissioner of Police, Na...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Writ Petitions Challenging Goa Public Health (Amendment) Act, 2005 on Grounds of Legislative Competence. The Petitioners Alleged Encroachment on Central Tobacco Act and Occupied Field, Seeking Quashing of State Provisions Banning Tobacco-Containing Food.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Goa, challenging the con...