KAHC010142892018_1
8 Dec 2025These cross-appeals arose from the Judgment and Award dated 19.01.2018 in MVC No. 758/2015 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mysuru. The ...
Search Results for "goods auto-rickshaw"
28 result(s) found
Found 28 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Dismisses Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Reduced Due to Contributory Negligence and Lack of Proof of Income. The court held that the claimant, a pillion rider, was guilty of contributory negligence for not wearing a helmet and that the income assessed by the Tribunal was excessive without evidence.
4 Nov 2024The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, Muniyappa, was a pillion rider on a motorcycle that met with an accid...
- 113
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Dismisses Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Reduced Due to Contributory Negligence of Minor Rider. Minor driving motorcycle without license and without helmet contributed to accident; insurer not liable for breach of policy conditions.
4 Nov 2024The case involves two appeals arising from a motor vehicle accident claim. The claimant, Muniyappa, a vegetable vendor, sustained injuries when the mo...
- 100
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Holds that Taking Insurance Policy for Commercial Premises is for Commercial Purpose, Excluding Complainant from Definition of 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court ruled that a commercial entity taking fire insurance policy for its business premises is not a 'consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Act, as the policy is taken for commercial purpose.
13 Apr 2023The present appeals by special leave assail the judgment and order dated 3rd December, 2004 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Na...
- 162
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Case — Owner Not Liable for Compensation as Driver Had Valid License and Insurance Policy Covered Risk. The court held that under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the insurer is liable to pay compensation when the driver has a valid license and the policy is in force.
21 Mar 2023The appellant, Sri Gopalakrishna G Nayak, owner of a Bajaj luggage carrier auto rickshaw, filed this appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles...
- 303
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Claimant as Driver-cum-Owner Not Entitled to Compensation Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held that a claimant who is the driver-cum-owner of the offending vehicle cannot maintain a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the provision is intended for third parties and not for the owner/driver of the vehicle involved in the accident.
23 Jan 2023The present appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. challenging the judgment and award dated 11.09.2014 passed by the Principal Senior...
- 90
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Holds Insurer Liable for Autorickshaw Accident Despite Driver Lacking Transport Endorsement. Driving Licence for Light Motor Vehicle Covers Autorickshaw as Public Transport Vehicle Under Section 2(21) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
23 Aug 2022The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 24.10.2009 passed by the MACT, Mangaluru in MV...
- 164
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case, Reversing NCDRC's Dismissal on Consumer Status. Overdraft Facility Availed by Stockbroker for Business Qualifies as Consumer Service Under Exception for Self-Employment Livelihood in Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
22 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissing a consumer complaint on the ground that the...
- 648
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Limits Owner's Liability to Rs. 50,000 Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimants' Failure to Prove Negligence Renders Claim Under Section 166 Unsustainable; Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication Under No-Fault Provision.
30 Nov -0001The present appeals arise out of a motor accident claim case. The appellant in First Appeal No.523 of 2016, Pawan s/o Gulchand Musale, is the owner of...
- 113
