Search Results for "gold jewellery"

117 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 117 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Orders Rs. 25 Lakh Compensation in Matrimonial Misappropriation Case. Upholding a woman’s right to her stridhan, the Supreme Court reverses a Kerala High Court ruling, ordering compensation for misappropriation of gold.

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of misappropriation of stridhan (gold jewellery) in a matrimonial dispute. The appellant, Maya Gopinathan, alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Quashes Customs' Seizure of Gold Chain, Orders Refund of Rs. 35,00,000 to Petitioner. Misapplication of Baggage Rules and Unjust Penalty Overturned; Personal Effects Defined and Upheld

The court reviewed the case of a petitioner whose gold chain with pendant was seized by Customs on allegations of smuggling. The petitioner argued tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Set Aside Conviction Under Sections 120B and 411 IPC — Ordered Return of Seized Gold Bars to Appellant. Acquittal of Co-Accused Upheld — Failure to Prove Seized Gold Was Stolen Property — Reasonable Doubt Favored Accused

Constitution of India (COI) — Article 21 — Right to Fair Trial — Burden of Proof on Prosecution — Chain of Circumstances Must Be Complete. In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Lack of Proximity and Non-Application of Mind. Detention orders set aside as the detenus were not directly involved in smuggling and the detaining authority failed to consider less drastic alternatives.

The Bombay High Court, by a judgment dated 24 January 2014, allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Failure to Prove Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302 and 394 IPC Set Aside Due to Lack of Motive, Last Seen Evidence, and Recovery of Articles.

The appellant, Pramil @ Premanand Rao, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder and r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case for Non-Application of Mind. Detenu in judicial custody; detaining authority failed to consider less restrictive alternatives under ordinary law, rendering detention order invalid.

The petitioner, Mahesh V. Amesur, cousin of Jeetu Shankarlal Chhapru, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Double Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Complete and Accused Failed to Explain Incriminating Facts Under Section 313 CrPC.

The appellant, Rajesab Mujawar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji in Sessions Case No. 20/2008 for the murder of Shekappa Bhandar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Loss Deduction for Confiscated Foreign Currency in Income Tax Reference. Foreign currency confiscated by customs authorities under FERA held allowable as business loss under Income Tax Act, 1961, even though treated as undisclosed income.

The case involves an income tax reference by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for the assessment year 1982-83...