Search Results for "genital injuries"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Two Accused Labourers in Gang Rape Case—Sole Testimony of Victim Upheld. Absence of Genital Injuries on Married Woman with Grown Children Held Not Fatal to Conviction Under Section 376(g) Indian Penal Code.

The case involved a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the conviction of two labourers for gang rape and criminal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 376(2)(f) of IPC. Appellant Contends That Evidence Only Proves Attempt to Rape, Not Penetration, Challenging Conviction for Rape of a Minor Below 12 Years.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant for the rape of a ten-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code. On Novembe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC; Challenges Correctness of Trial Court's Finding. Trial Court Convicted Accused for Rape of Minor Girl Aged Three Years, Sentenced to Ten Years RI and Compensation.

The present appeal was filed against the judgment and order dated 4.12.2009 by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Ambejogai in Sessions Case No.21/2008,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Absence of Direct Evidence of Penetration. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC.

The appellant, Deepak Shankarrao Borkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 7 of 2012 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Age Below 18 Years and Relied on Contradictory Testimony.

The appellant, Asif s/o Jakir Pathan, was convicted by the Special Judge/Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Special Case (POCSO) No.173 of 2016 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act and IPC — Medical Evidence and Victim's Testimony Sufficient. Child Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Report of Tear in Hymen Establish Offence Under Section 376(1) IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Nana @ Dnyneshwar Yerme, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act and IPC for kidnapping and raping a four-year-old girl....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor Based on Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence. The court held that the sole testimony of the victim, if credible, is sufficient for conviction under Section 376 IPC, and medical evidence corroborated the rape.

The appellant, Vincent Fernandes, was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for raping a 14-year-old girl on 31 March 1999 at Van...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Support Penetration and Witness Testimony Contained Material Contradictions.

The appellant, Sudam Ramnath Shelke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the ...