Search Results for "further cross-examination"

1167 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1167 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty for Accused in Rape and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 376 IPC sustained as witness testimonies were trustworthy and chain of circumstances was complete, applying last seen theory and Section 106 Evidence Act.

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal by an accused convicted under Sections 302 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the rape and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Anandrao @ Anil Baban Kharade and Vijay Hiraman Bahare, were convicted by the adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay at Sewre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder in Gram Panchayat Election Dispute — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone. Appellants convicted under Section 307 read with 34 IPC for assaulting victim due to Facebook dispute settlement, but acquitted of conspiracy and harbouring.

The appellants, original accused nos.1 to 3, were convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No.314 of 2014 for the of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cross-Examination in Customs Show Cause Proceedings - Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses Whose Statements Are Relied Upon Is a Fundamental Principle of Natural Justice

The petitioner, Kalpena Industries Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacturing polyethylene/polypropylene ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Doubtful Identification and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Abdul Ahad, Abdul Ashfak, and Abdul Akil, were convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Rambabu under Section 302 read with S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves five criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, dated 27-6-2013 in Sessions Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Form Complete Chain.

The appellant, Rekha Sitaram Chavan, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of her husband Sitaram Chavan. The prosec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Women for Murder by Burning in Dowry-Related Case. Dying Declaration Held Sufficient for Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellants, Surekha Bharat Kute and Kantabai Asharam Nagargoje, were convicted by the trial court for the murder of Ranjana Raghunath Kute, who di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Re-examination of Witness in Civil Suit. Re-examination Permissible to Explain Ambiguities Arising from Cross-Examination Under Order 18 Rule 4 CPC.

The petitioner, Shri Gurdial Singh, proprietor of M/s Bir Horizons, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an interlo...