Search Results for "fundamental rules"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award Set Aside by Single Judge. Limited Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Precludes Re-appreciation of Evidence Unless Award Shocks Conscience or Conflicts with Public Policy.

The dispute arose between Appellant, a foreign company manufacturing biscuits in Zimbabwe, and Respondent, an Indian partnership firm, regarding the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Disabled Army Veteran as ITAT Member -- Quashes Compulsory Retirement Finding Mala Fide Actions and Departmental Vendetta -- Upholds SCSC Recommendations in Writ Petition Under Article 32

The Supreme Court allowed a writ petition filed by Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj against the Union of India and another respondent -- The petitioner, a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in TADA Case Due to Procedural Lapses in Recording Confessional Statements. Confessions Under TADA Act Deemed Inadmissible Due to Non-Compliance with Safeguards

Procedural Safeguards under TADA Act: The Court emphasized that confessions recorded under Section 15 of the TADA Act must strictly comply with the p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Pension Rights of Temporary Employees Under a Government Scheme

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 32 – Writ Petition Against Pension Denial – Applicability of Fundamental Rules – Parity With Government ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Tribunal Upholds Employee's Right to Voluntary Retirement. High Court affirms Central Administrative Tribunal's decision, granting employee voluntary retirement amidst personal hardship.

The petitioners challenged the Central Administrative Tribunal's (CAT) order granting voluntary retirement to the respondent. The respondent, employed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...