Search Results for "freedom fighter scheme"

54 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 54 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Proceedings Initiated Without Jurisdiction in Writ Petition Under Articles 226 and 227. Upa-Lokayukta lacked authority to act on private complaint without government reference under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984.

The petitioner, Sri M.V. Srinivasa Gowda, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition for Reconsideration of Freedom Fighter Pension Claim in Hyderabad Liberation Movement Case. Rejection Set Aside Due to Non-Consideration of Revised Application and Supporting Affidavits Under Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980.

The petitioner, Smt. Kaushlabai wd/o. Ranchoddas Vaishnav (Bairagi), aged 80 years, is the widow of late Ranchoddas Vaishnav, who claimed to have part...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition for Freedom Fighter Pension Under Swatantrya Sainik Sanman Pension Scheme. The court held that the petitioner, as widow of an underground freedom fighter, is entitled to pension benefits from 14-08-1995.

The petitioner, Sarubai w/o Narayansinh Thakur, aged 87 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Freedom Fighter Pension Due to Lack of Sufficient Evidence. Claim for Samman Pension under Freedom Fighter Pension Scheme, 1972 rejected as petitioner failed to prove participation in Hyderabad Liberation Movement with credible documentary evidence.

The petitioner, Shri Ramkishan s/o. Narhari Sangewar, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 4th August 2004 rejecting his claim for Samman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Freedom Fighter Pension Claim for Underground Participant in Hyderabad Mukti Sangram. Rejection of Second Application Set Aside as Authorities Failed to Consider Fresh Material and Apply Correct Policy.

The petitioner, Kalidas Nivrutti Dhale, an 86-year-old underground freedom fighter, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 read with Article...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging One-Man Commission Report on Freedom Fighter Pension Claims — No Violation of Natural Justice Found. Petitioners failed to establish bias or procedural irregularity in the Commission's inquiry under the Freedom Fighters' Pension Scheme.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by Anandrao Sahebrao Thosar, Dadarao Sonaji Bhopale, and Vitthal Nivrutti Misal, all aged around 77-7...