Search Results for "foreign arbitral award"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "foreign arbitral award"

171 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by State Undertaking in BOT Arbitration Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award on Termination Payment. Court Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Emphasizing Finality of Arbitral Awards.

29 May 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MPRDC) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Award in Favor of Petitioner in Arbitration Dispute. Court Holds That Award Does Not Violate Public Policy and Condoned Delay of 273 Days Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Oct 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse S.A., a Swiss company, entered into a contract with the respondent, Sakuma Exports Limited, an I...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Arbitration Act Case Regarding Foreign Award Enforcement. Non-Signatory Parties Not Bound by Arbitration Agreement Under Alter Ego Doctrine for Enforcement Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards under Part II of the Arbitration and Conci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Clarifying Jurisdiction Requirements Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Held That Service of Section 21 Notice and Inclusion in Section 11 Application Are Not Prerequisites for Arbitral Tribunal to Exercise Jurisdiction Over a Person, and Impleadment is Based on Being Party to Arbitration Agreement.

17 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 01.06.2012 between the appellant and respondent no. 1 to form a Limited Liability Partnership (respondent no...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Concessionaire in Airport Metro Express Line Dispute. The court held that the Delhi High Court's interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was unjustified, as the Arbitral Tribunal's findings on defects and material breach in the concession agreement were based on evidence and within its jurisdiction.

9 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals arising from a dispute between Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (DAMEPL), the appellant and co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Agency Dispute — Award Declared Enforceable as Decree. Foreign Award Under Sections 46-49 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Upheld as No Grounds for Refusal Under Section 48 Established.

28 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd., a Japanese shipping company, filed a petition under Sections 46 to 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Port Development Dispute — Liquidated Damages Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, proof of actual loss is necessary for claiming liquidated damages, and the arbitrator's finding was not patently illegal.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Board of Trustees for Jawaharlal Nehru Port, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a licence agreement ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Foreign Award Enforcement. Court holds that under the amended Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, only the High Court having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the award can entertain interim measures, not any court where assets are located.

9 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Trammo DMCC, a company incorporated in the UAE, obtained a foreign arbitral award against the respondent, Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Foreign Award Not Challengeable Under Domestic Provisions. The court held that a foreign award cannot be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and mere denial of the agreement does not convert it into a domestic award.

28 Feb 2005

The appeal arose from an order of a single judge dismissing the appellant's petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, c...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)