Search Results for "foreclosure decree"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation Against Rejection of Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award. Arbitrator's Findings on Contractual Interpretation and Delay Held Final Under Section 30 of Arbitration Act, 1940.

The appellant, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, had invited tenders for re-construction of Zakariya Bunder road in May 1989. Respondent no.1 s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Second Appeal in Property Ownership Dispute. Plaintiff's Ownership Upheld Based on Concurrent Findings of Fact Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the Union of India and other defendants against the judgment of the appellate court which declared the resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Suit Not Barred by Limitation Under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves an interim application filed by the defendants in a commercial suit for specific performance. The plaintiff, Rajdhani Textiles Pvt. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Mortgage Recovery Suit — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Transfer of Mortgage Rights Requires Proper Registration Under Section 17 of Registration Act, 1908.

The appellant, Milagres Sales Coutinho, filed a second appeal before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the judgment and order dated 22.06.2012 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Pre-emption Suit, Holding That Right of Pre-emption Is a Weak Right and Must Be Strictly Proved — Plaintiff Failed to Establish Superior Right Under Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913.

The present appeals arise from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 17.08.2007, which allowed two second appeals (RSA No.1470/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order : No Privity of Contract Between Parties, Respondent Not a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Court Holds No Tripartite Agreement Proven, Respondent Not Entitled to Compensation Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Privity of Contract Essential for Consumer Status: The Court reiterated that for a person to qualify as a ‘consumer’ under the CPA, t...