Search Results for "factory protest"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "factory protest"

131 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 131 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Legality of Entry Tax on Goods Imported from Abroad; State Legislations of Orissa, Bihar, Kerala and Jharkhand Under Scrutiny

1 Aug 2026

Background: The case involves a batch of civil appeals before the Supreme Court concerning the levy of entry tax on goods imported from foreign countr...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Former Employees of Wellman Hindustan Limited Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unpaid Wages Under MRTU and PULP Act

24 Feb 2026

The High Court of Bombay heard multiple connected writ petitions challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of a complaint filed by former employees...

High Court

RFIRST APPEAL NO. 3732 of 2023

30 Jan 2026

The High Court of Gujarat heard two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Demolition of Industrial Shed Without Notice — Violation of Natural Justice and Statutory Procedure Under MMC Act, 1888. The court held that demolition without prior notice under Sections 351, 354, and 488 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, is illegal and void.

8 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Raj Bucket Factory, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of its industrial shed by the Muni...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Wear and Tear Exclusion Not Applicable to Sudden Breakdown. The court held that the insurer failed to prove that the bearing failure was due to wear and tear, and the breakdown was a fortuitous event covered under the Industrial All Risk Policy.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, United Phosphorous Limited, was in the business of pesticides and chemicals. It purchased a Gas Turbine Engine from GE Packaged Power ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Policy Exclusion for Wear and Tear Does Not Apply to Sudden Breakdown. The court held that the majority arbitrators' interpretation of the exclusion clause was plausible and not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, United Phosphorous Limited, purchased a Gas Turbine Engine from GE and obtained an Industrial All Risk Policy from the respondent, Uni...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Gratuity Award for Non-Seasonal Employees in Ginning Factory. Employees working as Wireman and Press Driver held entitled to gratuity at fifteen days' wages per year under Section 4(2) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, not seven days per season.

20 Apr 2017

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Madhaodas Jankidas Mohta Ginning and Pressing Factory (the employer) challenging orders of the Controlli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tax Demand Against Manufacturer for Vehicles Used Within Factory Premises — Motor Vehicles Taxation Act Does Not Apply to Vehicles Not Used on Public Roads. The court held that vehicles used solely within factory premises are not 'used in a public place' under Section 3 of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1958, and demand notices issued without jurisdiction and barred by limitation are illegal.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Tata Motors Limited, a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of commercial v...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Cess Paid Under Protest in Excise Matter — Unjust Enrichment Principle Not Applicable to Cess Under IDR Act. Section 11-B of Central Excise Act Held Inapplicable to Cess Collected Under Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, and Refund Directed with Interest.

26 Apr 2005

The petitioners, Shree Vidhya Paper Mills and Mr. Rameshwarlal Motilal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking refund of Rs. 10,19,246...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)