Search Results for "eyewitness absence"

666 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 666 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramrao Dattoba Deshmukh, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302 and 397 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's testimony was found to be unreliable and contradictory.

The appellant, Amit Mishra, was convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Session Trial No. 424 of 1993 for offences punishable under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused Nos. 2-5 in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 r/w Section 149 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was full of contradictions, omissions, and improvements, and no independent witness supported the prosecution case.

The case pertains to the murder of Bal Kishan, son of informant Mullo Bai, which occurred on 01.12.2005 at around 4-5 a.m. in Village Hinotiya Gird. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by other evidence.

The case involves a criminal appeal against conviction for murder and other offences. The appellants were convicted by the trial court for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Evidence of Interested Witness Was Contradictory and Improbable.

The appellant, Kalam Gulab Patel, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karad, for the murder of his cousin Sikandar Ismail Patel under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The appellant, Shankar Maruti Bamne, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, for the murder of Ranganath Karande under Section 302...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Harishchandra Rathod, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati for the murder of Sushama under Section 302 IPC and sent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 342 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by medical or circumstantial evidence.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 302 and 342 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellants, Nijamuddin...