Search Results for "external peer review committee"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Vice-Chancellor of Pune University; Holds No Violation of Prescribed Qualifications. Court Finds that Petitioner Failed to Prove That Incumbent Lacked Essential Qualifications Under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Dr. Prabhakar J. Lavakare challenging the appointment of Respondent No.4, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging University Communication Modifying Principal's Tenure. Government Resolution dated 15.03.2011 governs appointment of Principal and University cannot unilaterally modify tenure.

The Petitioner, Gram Vikas Education Society, runs a grant-in-aid college called Rani Indirabai Bhonsale Mahavidyalaya at Kuhi, Nagpur. Respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Suo Motu Reference on Summoning Advocates During Investigation; Examines Scope of Advocate-Client Privilege and Need for Guidelines to Prevent Coercive Summons. Court Addresses Legality of Direct Summons to Lawyers Under Section 179 BNSS and Absence of Judicial Oversight.

The Supreme Court initiated suo motu proceedings following a reference from a two-judge bench in a Special Leave Petition challenging a notice issued ...