Search Results for "extension of mandate"

7 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Earlier Refusal to Extend Mandate Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act — Refusal to Extend Mandate Does Not Terminate Arbitral Proceedings or Bar Fresh Appointment Under Section 11.

The case involves a dispute arising out of a Deed of Assignment of Development Rights dated 6 December 2010 between the applicants (Nalin Vallabhbhai ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Demise of Arbitrator and Insolvency of Party Held Sufficient Cause for Extension Despite Lack of Consent Under Section 29-A(3).

The petitioners, Scape Marketing Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. District Court's Appointment of Sole Arbitrator Upheld as Petitioner's Non-Participation Caused Delay.

The Petitioner, M/s. Magnum Opus IT consulting Private Limited, a company engaged in e-governance, challenged an order dated 03/02/2021 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Refuses to Substitute Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Mandate Extension Petitions Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Allegations of Bias and Delay Based on Adverse Rulings in Related IHFL Arbitration Found Insufficient to Justify Drastic Substitution.

The judgment concerned two arbitration petitions filed under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Indiabulls Infraestate Ltd....