Search Results for "explanatory statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "explanatory statement"

311 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 311 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows SEBI's Appeal Against Securities Appellate Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Penalties for Fraudulent Diversion of Funds. The Court Held That Immediate Diversion of Preferential Allotment Proceeds from Disclosed Objects Constitutes Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Under SEBI PFUTP Regulations, 2003, and Ratification Cannot Cure Such Violations.

17 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from Securities and Exchange Board of India's (SEBI) action against Terrascope Ventures Limited (formerly Moryo Industries Limited) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Relief in Suit Challenging Show Cause Notices Issued Under 2024 RBI Master Directions Based on Forensic Audit by Allegedly Unqualified Auditor. Petitioner Contends that Audit Firm Not Chartered Accountant and Report Invalid Under Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and RBI Directions.

24 Dec 2025

This matter concerned three suits filed by the plaintiff, Anil D. Ambani, against Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI Bank, Bank of Baroda, and others, along w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Coconut Oil Classification Dispute — Holds Pure Coconut Oil in Small Packings Classifiable as Hair Oil Under Heading 3305. The Court applied Section Note 2 and Chapter Note 3 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, ruling that packaging for retail sale as hair oil overrides classification as edible oil under Heading 1513.

13 Dec 2024

The case involved appeals by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against M/s. Madhan Agro Industries (India) Private Ltd. concerning the clas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Notification 14/2010-ST is Clarificatory for Service Tax on Drilling Rigs in Continental Shelf. Appeal Admitted on Questions of Territorial Applicability of Service Tax to Offshore Drilling Services Under Finance Act, 1994.

28 Apr 2015

The appellant, M/s. Greatship (India) Ltd., entered into contracts with ONGC in February and May 2009 to provide offshore drilling services using hire...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding-Up Order in Bond Default Case; Upholds Adverse Remarks Against Directors for Fund Diversion. Company Found Unable to Pay Debts and Substratum Lost, Justifying Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and 433(f) of Companies Act, 1956.

23 Apr 2014

The appeal arose from a winding-up order passed by the learned company Judge against Zenith Infotech Limited (the appellant) in a petition filed by Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Failure to Repay Convertible Bonds — Debt Admitted and Company Unable to Pay Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that where a debt is admitted and the company is commercially insolvent, a winding up order is justified.

30 Jul 2013

The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as trustee for bondholders, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Confirms Reduction of Equity Share Capital of Wartsila India Limited — Court Approves Special Resolution for Reduction of Share Capital to Provide Exit to Minority Shareholders, Rejecting Oppression Allegations. The Court held that the reduction was bona fide and not oppressive, and confirmed the reduction under Section 100 of the Companies Act, 1956.

15 Nov 2010

The judgment concerns a Company Petition filed by Wartsila India Limited (WIL) seeking confirmation of a special resolution passed on 10th November 20...

High Court

High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Transferor and Transferee Companies Despite Intervenor Objection. Non-Disclosure of Pre and Post Capital Structure in Explanatory Statement Did Not Invalidate Scheme When Shareholders Had Sufficient Information Under Section 393 of Companies Act, 1956.

31 Jan 2006

The transferor company, Chemidye Manufacturing Company Pvt. Ltd., and the transferee company, Thirumalai Chemicals Ltd., both engaged in similar chemi...

Supreme Court

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026

1 Jan 1970

The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)