Search Results for "excessive delegation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "excessive delegation"

109 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 109 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State Government's Power to Reorganize Khands and Terminate Kshettra Samities under U.P. Kshettra Samities and Zila Parishads Adhiniyam, 1961. Delegation of Such Power to Executive is Not Excessive and Does Not Violate Article 14.

13 Mar 1968

The appellant, Ayodhya Prasad Vajpai, was elected Pramukh of a Kshettra Samiti, with a term of five years. The Government of Uttar Pradesh issued two ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

6 Apr 2026

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Rules, 2022 as Ultra Vires the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. Substitution of 'Assistant Commissioner (Sub-Divisional Magistrate)' for 'Magistrate of the First Class or Presidency Magistrate' in Rule 9(3) was held to be beyond the rule-making power under Section 30 of the Act, as it conflicted with the specific mandate of Section 13(3) requiring a judicial order for delayed registrations beyond one year.

17 Apr 2023

The writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the validity of the Karnataka Registration of Births and De...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Constitutional Validity of Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 in Public Interest Litigation. Sections 10-17, 33-37, and 39 of the Act are not unconstitutional as they provide for public participation and do not delegate essential legislative functions.

12 Feb 2020

The petitioner, The United Goans Foundation, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of Contribution to District Mineral Foundation Under Rule 45(1A) of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 — Rule Held Ultra Vires the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The court quashed demands for DMF contribution as a condition for mineral dispatch, ruling that Rule 45(1A) is beyond the rule-making power under Section 15 of the MMDR Act.

7 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by mining lessees challenging the demand for contribution to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) of Income Tax Act and Rule 3(7)(i) of Income Tax Rules in Bank Employee Loan Perquisite Case. Delegation of Power to Prescribe Fringe Benefits Held Not Excessive and Use of SBI Prime Lending Rate as Benchmark Upheld as Non-Arbitrary.

7 May 2024

The Supreme Court, in a common judgment, dismissed appeals filed by staff unions and officers' associations of various banks challenging the constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Petition Challenging Construction of Residential Building and Public Parking Lot under DCR and MRTP Act — Court Examines Legality of Approvals and Concessions Granted by Municipal Commissioner. The Court Considers Whether Circular Restricting Public Parking Lots to Four Floors Overrides Provisions of DCR 33(24) and Implications of Notices under Sections 51 and 53(1) of MRTP Act.

13 May 2013

The Public Interest Litigation petition filed in 2012 before the Bombay High Court challenged the legality of approvals and construction of a 56‑sto...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of No-Confidence Motion Rules Under Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj Act, 1993. Rule 3(1), 3(2), and 3(4) of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayath Raj (Motion of No-Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayath) Rules, 1994 held intra vires the parent Act.

19 Dec 2019

The petitioner, B.R. Siddaramu, was the Upadhyaksha (Vice President) of Gollahalli Grama Panchayat. He was aggrieved by a notice dated 26.08.2019 issu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications for Mahatma Gandhi Memorial, Upholds Validity of Commissioners of Divisions Act. Failure to Specify Instrumentality for Public Purpose Does Not Invalidate Notifications Under Sections 4 and 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

17 Oct 1969

The appeal arose out of land acquisition proceedings initiated for setting up a memorial (Samadhi) to Mahatma Gandhi on the banks of the Sabarmati Riv...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Constitutional Validity of Goa Public Men's Corruption (Investigation and Inquiries) Commission Act, 1988 — Dismisses Petitions Challenging Commission's Powers and Composition. The Court held that the Act does not violate Articles 14, 19, 21, or 311 of the Constitution and that the Commission is a fact-finding body with no adjudicatory powers.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of the Goa Pub...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)