Search Results for "exception period six years"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "exception period six years"

1580 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1580 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Notice under MVAT Act as Assessments Not Time-Barred. Extended Limitation Periods under Section 21(3) and Section 23(3A) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2005 Applied to Pre-2008 Assessment Years.

18 Jan 2013

The case arose from a writ petition filed by Sahyadri Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative sugar mill and registered dealer under the Maharash...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Order Granting Retirement Age of 60 Years to Permanent Teacher. Exception under Rule 82.1 of Secondary School Code applies to all permanent teachers in service on 31st December 1995, not only those confirmed before a specific date.

4 Jan 2010

The management of a school filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the School Tribunal which held that respondent No.2, a teacher, was entit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Conflicting Divisions on Whether Under Section 9A of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act Time Limit for Caste Validity Certificate is Directory or Mandatory. The Reference Arises from a Writ Petition Challenging Automatic Termination of a Councillor's Election for Non-Production of Caste Validity Certificate Within Six Months.

9 Dec 2016

The reference arose out of a writ petition challenging the election of a councillor from a reserved ward for Other Backward Classes (OBC) women in Bho...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Limitation Case Under Section 144C. Nagarathna J. Holds That Section 144C Does Not Extend Limitation Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

This separate opinion by Nagarathna J. arises from civil appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order of the Bombay High Court. The High Court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Termination of Probationer Without Inquiry. Automatic Termination Clause in Appointment Letter Held Invalid as Termination Was Stigmatic and Required Domestic Inquiry Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

1 Oct 2015

The petitioner, WIKA Instruments India Pvt. Ltd., challenged the judgment and award of the Labour Court dated 14 November 2011, which held that the te...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order for Lack of Proper Opportunity of Hearing and Non-Communication of Section 151 Approval in Income Tax Reopening Proceedings. The court held that the Assessing Officer failed to grant a personal hearing as directed by the earlier order of the High Court and did not communicate the approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, rendering the reassessment invalid.

20 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Wavy Construction LLP, challenged an order dated 14 October 2021 rejecting its objections against reopening of assessment under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Superannuation at 60 Years — Upholds Government's Refusal to Extend Service Age Based on Confidential Report Grades. Court holds that clause 11(4) of Government Resolution dated 05.03.2011 requiring minimum three 'A' and two 'B+' grades in preceding five years is mandatory and not arbitrary.

29 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Reeta Harode, a government employee, reached the age of 60 years on 31.10.2013. She sought extension of her superannuation age up ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Regulatory Commission's Order Restricting Depreciation to Actual Supply Period in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Depreciation under Regulation 6.32 of DERC (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Generation Tariff) Regulations, 2011 cannot be allowed beyond the period of actual supply of electricity to consumers, as consumer interest is paramount under Section 61(d) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

7 May 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (Commission) against the judgment of the Appellate Tribunal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Entire Rule 15 of MEPS Rules Applies to Probationary Employees Under Section 5(3) of MEPS Act — Non-Compliance of Sub-Rules (3) and (5) Does Not Ipso Facto Vitiate Termination if Sub-Rule (6) Is Satisfied. The court clarified that only sub-rule (6) of Rule 15 is relevant for termination during probation, and failure to comply with sub-rules (3) and (5) does not automatically invalidate termination if the Management has objectively assessed the employee's performance.

30 May 2023

This judgment arises from a reference made by a learned Single Judge to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, concerning the interpretati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Limitation in Insolvency Petition Initiated by Financial Creditor. Application Under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Held Within Limitation After Excluding Time Spent in SARFAESI Proceedings Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

22 Mar 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissing an appeal against an order of the National Company ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)