Search Results for "ex-parte default judgment"

109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Ex-parte Decree Set Aside Due to Improper Service of Summons. First Appellate Court's Order Restored as Trial Court Failed to Comply with Order V Rule 17 CPC.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract (O.S.No.126/2007) alleging that the respondent/defendant executed an agreeme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex Parte Decree in Money Suit — Service of Summons Valid Under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC. The court held that the defendant had knowledge of the suit and failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance, upholding the ex parte decree.

The appellant, M/s. CliniRX Research Pvt. Ltd., was the original defendant in a money suit filed by the respondent, Bicare Limited, for recovery of mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Summary Judgment Under UK Civil Procedure Rules Is a Judgment on Merits Executable in India Under Section 13 CPC. Foreign decree passed under Part 24 of UK CPR is considered a judgment on merits and is conclusive under Section 13 CPC, thus executable under Section 44A CPC.

The present chamber summons was taken out by the judgment debtor (defendant no.3) seeking adjournment to raise attachment of a flat and dismissal of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Impleadment Application in Property Suit — Plaintiffs Fail to Establish Prima Facie Title or Possession. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC requires direct legal interest; vague claims of possession without documentary evidence insufficient for impleadment.

The judgment pertains to a Notice of Motion filed by the plaintiffs in a suit seeking a declaration of ownership and possession of a property. The pla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Claim for Short-Landed Cargo Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove that the consignment was loaded on board the vessel and that the suit was barred by limitation under the Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.

The plaintiff, Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of US$154,000 representing the CIF value of 40 drums of Lincomycin HCL BP ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Extends Time for Payment Under Section 148 CPC Despite Plaintiff's Objection in Consent Decree Default Case. Court holds that Section 148 CPC empowers the court to extend time for payment in a consent decree for reasonable cause, even without the consent of the decree-holder.

The case arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the Defendants (Applicants) to set aside an ex parte decree dated 19 December 2012 in Summary Suit No...