Search Results for "ex-gratia bonus"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "ex-gratia bonus"

6 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Management’s Appeal, Confirms Ex-Gratia Bonus for Workmen but Declares Strike Unjustified. Agreement Under Section 34(3) of Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, Formed by Communication of Cabinet Decision; Strike During Conciliation Devoid of Justification.

15 Nov 1968

The appeal arose from an industrial dispute between the Management of Fertilizer Corporation of India, a Central Government undertaking, and its workm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Deduction for Salary Arrears and Exgratia Bonus in Income Tax Appeal — Liability Under Palekar Award Accrued in Relevant Year. The Court held that provision for additional salary and wages arising from Justice Palekar Award and exgratia bonus paid over and above eligible bonus under Payment of Bonus Act are allowable as business expenditure under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

8 Mar 2024

The appellant, Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd., engaged in printing and publishing, filed an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Principal Employer Challenging Gratuity Liability for Contractor's Employees. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Section 7 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Gratuity of Contractor's Workmen When Contractor Fails to Pay.

5 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Cummins (I) Limited, an engineering company, challenged a common order dated 30 May 2003 passed by the Controlling Authority under the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act — Scope Limited to Existing Adjudicated Rights. The court held that the Labour Court cannot decide new claims for benefits not awarded in the original reinstatement order, as Section 33(C)(2) is only for computation of pre-existing rights.

17 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Smt. Neeta S. Pathak, was a workman who had been reinstated with back wages by an order dated 10th April 1991. Subsequently, she filed...

High Court

Writ petition challenges the Industrial Court's declaration that the Municipal Corporation committed unfair labour practice by denying ex-gratia payment to striking workers. The dispute involves interpretation of items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, regarding discriminatory denial of a long-standing annual festival payment.

8 Aug 2012

Petitioner No. 1, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, a statutory authority under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, employs over 14...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 4810 OF 2012

12 Sep 2012

The case involves a group of writ petitions filed by former employees of National Organic Chemicals Ltd. (NOCIL) against Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. (n...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)