Search Results for "electricity bill"

296 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 296 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Indian Railways' Appeals, Upholds Its Status as Deemed Distribution Licensee Under Electricity Act, 2003. Railways Not Liable to Pay Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access as It Is Not a Consumer Under Section 2(15) of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways against the judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows JSW Steel's Challenge to Electricity Duty Demand on Captive Consumption. Held that electricity generated from captive power plant and consumed for own use is not 'sold' and thus not exigible to electricity duty under the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958.

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, a company engaged in steel manufacturing, operates a captive power plant (CPP) at its factory in Raigad, Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petition Against Electricity Ombudsman Order Limiting Recovery of Arrears Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. Court upholds two-year limitation period for recovery of electricity charges, rejecting claim for arrears from 2003 to 2010.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order of the Electricity Ombudsman dated December 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Pvt Ltd. Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Scheme does not override State Commission's power to determine tariff for wind energy under Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The case involves appeals under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, by Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited and other distribution licensees against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Licensee's Appeal in Electricity Billing Dispute — Holds Additional Demand Time-Barred for Disconnection Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003. The two-year limitation for disconnection runs from the date of the original bill, not from discovery of a billing mistake.

The case involves a dispute between the Assistant Engineer (D1), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (appellant/licensee) and Rahamatullah Khan alias Ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring distribution licensees to pay compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated period is valid and not ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), through its Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BES&T), filed a writ petition un...