Search Results for "double recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "double recovery"

581 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 581 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Settlement Under Own Policy Bars Further Recovery. Claimant who accepted full and final settlement from his own insurer cannot claim compensation from the opposite insurer for the same damage under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

9 Aug 2018

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), North Goa, Panaji, dated 18.11...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against DRT Order in Debt Recovery Case — Bank Entitled to Recover Debt Under RDB Act. DRT Has Inherent Power to Reject Frivolous Counterclaim Without Recording Evidence, and High Court Should Not Interfere When Alternative Remedy of Appeal Exists.

18 Dec 2019

The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Fin...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Vocational Teacher in Writ Petition Under Article 226 — Order Quashed Due to Violation of Principles Against Recovery from Retired Employees. Recovery of Excess Salary from Employee Who Had No Misrepresentation or Fraud Is Impermissible as Per State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih, and Order Passed Without Considering Petitioner's Objections Was Vitiated.

18 Feb 2025

The petitioner was a vocational teacher who retired from CSI Boys Higher Secondary School, Karur, on 31.03.2020. The dispute centered on the revision ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit for Price Paid for Undelivered Vacuum Drier — Defendant Failed to Deliver Goods Despite Receiving Advance Payments. The court held that the defendants were liable to refund the advance amount of Rs.2,64,590/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the suit till payment under the contract for sale of goods.

6 Jan 2010

The plaintiffs, M/s. Boolani Engineering Corporation, a registered partnership firm, filed a summary suit against the defendants, M/s. Milind Engg. Wo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition Against Pay Reduction and Recovery Order — Recovery of Excess Payment Set Aside Due to No Misrepresentation. Pay Fixation Error by Employer Cannot Be Recovered from Employee Without Show Cause Notice.

2 May 2019

The petitioner, Premchand Nathu Patil, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 16.06.1989 in a secondary school run by respondent No. 5 institute. He...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Employee in Voluntary Retirement Dispute — Employer Cannot Recover Excess Payment Without Opportunity of Hearing. Voluntary Retirement Application Deemed Accepted Under Rule 48 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 When Not Rejected Within Notice Period.

2 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Arjun Gorabhai Rathod, was an employee of the State of Gujarat. He applied for voluntary retirement on 19.10.2019 with a notice period...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Guarantor's Petition in RDB Act Execution Case — Notice Under Section 31A Mandatory. Failure to Serve Notice on Judgment Debtors Before Issuing Recovery Certificate Violates Natural Justice and Section 31A of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

14 Jun 2017

The petitioner, Dr. Sudhakar Borkar, was a guarantor to a loan taken by respondent No.5 (M/s R & S Enterprises) from respondent No.1 (State Bank of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Alleged Excess Pay from Leave Encashment – Section 33-C(1) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Recovery of excess payment after five years held iniquitous and arbitrary, following Chandi Prasad Uniyal principle.

19 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Vilas Pandurang Markande, a former employee of the Mumbai Port Trust (respondent No.2), filed a Writ Petition challenging the order da...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows TIIC's Recovery Petition Against Guarantors in SFC Act Case — Guarantors Held Jointly and Severally Liable Despite Company's Winding Up. Liability of Guarantors Under Sections 31(a) and 31(aa) of State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 Survives Liquidation of Principal Borrower and Receipt of Amount from Official Liquidator.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited (TIIC), a State Financial Corporation, filed an original petition under Sections ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Deduction Rules for Compassionate Assistance in Motor Accident Compensation -- Appellants Appeals Against High Court Orders on Deduction of Haryana Government Scheme Benefits

24 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court addressed appeals filed by Appellants Company challenging High Court orders regarding deduction of compassionate assistance from mot...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)