Search Results for "double amputation"

12 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Injury Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.15 Lakhs Enhanced to Rs.27 Lakhs for 70% Disabled Mechanical Engineer. Loss of Earning Capacity Reassessed with 50% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 14 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Pratap Dandapani Padhi, a 43-year-old Mechanical Engineer working as a Foreman at Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited with a monthly s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Bona Fide Passenger and Untoward Incident Established. Fall from Train Due to Jerks Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989; Railway's Suicide Defence Fails for Non-Production of Loco Pilot Book.

The appeal arises from a claim for compensation under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, filed by the legal representatives of Mohd....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Reverses Railway Claims Tribunal Decision, Awards Rs. 8 Lakhs in Compensation for Untoward Incident. The appellant, mistakenly boarding the wrong train and sustaining injuries, was deemed a bona fide passenger eligible for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989.

This appeal, filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenges the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Injured Passenger Entitled to Compensation for Amputation. Bona Fide Passenger Status Established Despite Lost Ticket; Sudden Jerk Leading to Fall Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c) of Railways Act, 1989.

The appellant, Kishor Vishnu Bondre, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a train ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Injured Passenger Entitled to Compensation for Amputation of Both Legs. Initial Burden of Proof Discharged by Affidavit; Ticket Loss Explained.

The appellant, Atul Tandekar, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a train acciden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal Against Compensation Award for Traumatic Amputation. The Tribunal's assessment of 70% disability and award of Rs.5,02,600 under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was upheld as just and proper.

The case involves an appeal by the insurance company against an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, granting compensation to the clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Claimant Entitled to Compensation for Loss of Both Legs. Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989 — Standing Near Door in Crowded Compartment Not Negligence.

The appellant, Ravichand Khurchankar, a 26-year-old student, was travelling by Howrah-Ahmedabad Express from Gondia to Nagpur on 7 July 2002. Due to o...