Search Results for "disputed correspondence"

1155 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1155 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Letter of Credit Dispute in Common Judgment for Two Suits Arising from Alleged Discrepant Documents. Bank's Liability for Wrongful Debit Examined Under UCP 290 with Emphasis on Strict Compliance and Discrepancy in Shipping Documents.

Two suits were filed arising from a documentary import Letter of Credit facility granted by State Bank of India to Dadlani Silk Stores. Suit No. 1012 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — No Concluded Contract via Email Exchange. Unsigned Memorandum of Understanding Not Binding as Parties Did Not Intend to Be Bound Until Execution of Formal Agreement.

The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of a flat owned by the respondent (orig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal, Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Claim Dispute. Discharge Voucher Signed Under Protest and Coercion Does Not Bar Arbitration Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves an appeal by The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against a Bombay High Court order appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.238 OF 2019

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Excess and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrator Entertained Claims Beyond Scope of Reference and Relied on Unproved Certificates, Rendering Award Patently Illegal.

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a construction dispute between Country Club (India) Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.1543 OF 2014

The matter arose from a stock trading dispute between Keynote Capitals Ltd. (a trading member of the National Stock Exchange) and Eco Recycling Ltd. (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Amidst Disputed Insurance Claims. Navigating jurisdictional challenges and contractual non-disclosure in arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

A Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award for its alleged failur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Challenge to Arbitral Award Directing Payment of Rs.9,28,188.45 with Interest. The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from a member-client dispute over stock market transactions and margin shortfalls.

The petitioner filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicature at Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitrator Appointment in Tender Dispute Due to Absence of Concluded Contract. No Valid Arbitration Agreement Found as Letter of Intent Was Contingent on Formal Work Order Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute arose between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), a state government electricity distribution utility, an...