Search Results for "discriminatory tax exemption"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "discriminatory tax exemption"

141 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 141 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Profession Tax on Defence Civilians — Amendment Excluding Them from Exemption Upheld as Constitutional. The court held that the classification between Armed Forces personnel and civilian employees under Section 27A(a) of the Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment Act, 1975 is based on an intelligible differentia and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

7 Jul 2006

The petitioners, civilian employees working in the Defence Department of the Union of India, filed writ petitions challenging the action of the State ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discriminatory Sales Tax Rules Under Article 226. Held that Rule 31B and Rule 31AA of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 operate in different contexts and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

24 Jan 2017

The petitioners, M/s Graphite India Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Denial of Exemption for Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty under Section 8C of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Petitioner Asserts Notification No.96/2009-Cus. Intended to Exempt All Safeguard Duties and Phrase 'under section 8B' is Discriminatory.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioner, a public limited company manufacturing pneumatic tyres, regularly imported Carbon Black from the People’s Republic of China. Carbon ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Upon Challenge to Pre-Deposit Order and Validity of Explanation to Schedule Entry A-45 of MVAT Act, 2002. The Petition Seeks Quashing of Assessment and Pre-Deposit Orders for Pan Masala Containing Tobacco Exemption Denial and Striking Down of Discriminatory Notification.

4 Oct 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of pan masala with and without tobacco, challenged the levy of VAT on pan masala contai...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Levy of Sales Tax on Cane Jaggery While Exempting Palm Jaggery Under Madras Act. Classification Upheld as Cane and Palm Jaggery Are Commercially Different and Tax Does Not Violate Article 14 or 301.

17 Jul 1969

The appellants, dealers in cane jaggery in Tamil Nadu, challenged the levy of sales tax on cane jaggery while palm jaggery remained exempt, under the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Vires of Section 27A(a) of Maharashtra Profession Tax Act — Civilian Employees of Ammunition Factory Not Entitled to Exemption. The court held that the exemption under Section 27A(a) applies only to members of the armed forces and the provision is not violative of Article 14 as the classification is reasonable.

9 Jan 2006

The petitioners, Bhartiya Samrakshan Kamgar Sangh (a trade union) and its General Secretary and Vice President, filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Notification Exempting Light Motor Vehicles and MSRTC Buses from Toll on Sion-Panvel Highway. Dispute Arises from Concession Agreement Where Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Exemptions Cause Substantial Daily Revenue Loss and Contradicts Terms of Agreement.

8 Sep 2015

The dispute arose from a concession agreement for widening and maintaining an arterial highway from Mumbai to Panvel, awarded to M/s Sion Panvel Tollw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Section 2(24)(xviii) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Petitioner Challenges Taxation of Capital Subsidies as Income. The Court considered whether inclusion of subsidies and incentives in the definition of income under Section 2(24)(xviii) violates constitutional provisions and real income theory.

4 Dec 2023

The writ petition arose from a challenge to the constitutional validity of sub-clause (xviii) to Section 2(24) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, inserted b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of VAT on Pan Masala Containing Tobacco under MVAT Act, 2002. Exemption Under Schedule Entry A-45 Upheld and Part Payment Orders Quashed as Explanation Inserted by Notification dated 21.01.2006 Held Ultra Vires.

4 Oct 2016

The dispute arose under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 regarding the levy of VAT on pan masala containing tobacco (gutkha/mawa) for the fin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tax on Medical Reimbursement Above Rs.15,000 as Perquisite Under Section 17(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Medical reimbursement exceeding Rs.15,000 per annum treated as taxable perquisite is not arbitrary or discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 or 21 of the Constitution.

13 Nov 2006

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by bank employees' associations and an individual officer challenging the constitutional validity of ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)