Search Results for "discriminatory tax"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "discriminatory tax"

405 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 405 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Expenditure Tax Act Classification Between Hindu and Mappilla Undivided Families. Differential Treatment of Hindu Undivided Families and Mappilla Families Under Marumakkattayam Law is Not Discriminatory Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, 1950.

26 Feb 1969

The case concerned a challenge under Article 14 of the Constitution to Section 3(1) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957. The appellant was the karta of a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discriminatory Sales Tax Rules Under Article 226. Held that Rule 31B and Rule 31AA of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 operate in different contexts and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

24 Jan 2017

The petitioners, M/s Graphite India Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High C...

High Court

KAHC010217682014_1

12 Jun 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Entry Tax on Goods. Petitioners Argue That Differential Tax Burden on Imported LNG and Air Conditioners Violates Constitutional Provisions, Relying on Jindal Stainless Steel Principle.

4 Mar 2019

Three writ petitions were heard together by the Bombay High Court, all challenging the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Tax on the Entry of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Sections 23(5) of Income Tax Act, 1922 and 297(2)(g) and 271(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Against Double Taxation and Article 14 Challenges. Registered Firm’s Appeal Dismissed; Provisions on Double Taxation of Firm and Partners and Penalty Classification Held Valid.

18 Nov 1969

The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by a registered firm and its partners challenging the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Challenge to Fringe Benefit Tax Provisions. Petitions question constitutional validity of Chapter XII-H of Income Tax Act, 1961 as violative of Article 14 and beyond legislative competence.

6 Dec 2019

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard three writ petitions filed by M/s T.T.K. Prestige Ltd. and another, M/s N. Rangarao & Sons, and Karnata...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tax Notification Excluding Lead Sub-Oxide from Industrial Input List. Lead Sub-Oxide Held to Be an Industrial Input Under Entry 67 of Third Schedule to KVAT Act, Entitled to Reduced Tax Rate.

13 Jan 2016

The petitioner, M/s A.P.S. Industries, a partnership firm engaged in the manufacture and sale of Lead Sub Oxide (Lead Oxide Grey), challenged a notifi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011 by Numerous Temple Trusts. Petitioners Sought Declaration that the Amendment Act is Unconstitutional and Discriminatory under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

17 Nov 2015

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Levy of Sales Tax on Cane Jaggery While Exempting Palm Jaggery Under Madras Act. Classification Upheld as Cane and Palm Jaggery Are Commercially Different and Tax Does Not Violate Article 14 or 301.

17 Jul 1969

The appellants, dealers in cane jaggery in Tamil Nadu, challenged the levy of sales tax on cane jaggery while palm jaggery remained exempt, under the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Upon Challenge to Pre-Deposit Order and Validity of Explanation to Schedule Entry A-45 of MVAT Act, 2002. The Petition Seeks Quashing of Assessment and Pre-Deposit Orders for Pan Masala Containing Tobacco Exemption Denial and Striking Down of Discriminatory Notification.

4 Oct 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of pan masala with and without tobacco, challenged the levy of VAT on pan masala contai...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)