Search Results for "derivative transaction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "derivative transaction"

52 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Derivative Transaction Case. Exchange Traded Derivatives Held Not Speculative Under Section 43(5) of Income Tax Act, 1961, with Retrospective Application of Clause (d) of Proviso.

18 Apr 2011

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-IV against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in favor of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition by Deutsche Bank Against Finolex Industries Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 — Disputed Derivative Transaction Debt Precludes Summary Winding-Up. Court Holds That Winding-Up Petition Is Not a Debt Recovery Mechanism and Dismisses Petition with Costs.

28 Mar 2014

The judgment arises from a Company Petition filed by Deutsche Bank AG, Mumbai Branch, seeking winding-up of Finolex Industries Limited under Section 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

12 Mar 2014

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Derivative Transaction Dispute. Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails as Award Not Patently Illegal or Perverse.

29 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 6 July 2012 dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliatio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

29 May 2026

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

Tribunals

NCLAT Larger Bench Holds Shareholder/Promoter is an 'Aggrieved Person' Under Section 61 IBC and Has Locus to Challenge Section 7 Admission Order. The reference resolves conflicting views on maintainability of appeal by shareholder against admission of insolvency petition.

30 Nov -0001

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Chennai Bench, in a larger bench of three members, addressed a reference question: whether a share...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute for Patent Illegality and Perversity. The court found that the arbitrator's interpretation of a condition subsequent in a share purchase agreement was patently illegal and perverse, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Mar 2019

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award arising from a share purchase agree...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition by Senior Citizen for Annulment of Gift Deed Under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. Court holds that express recital in gift deed is not mandatory for invoking Section 23(1) and condition of maintenance can be inferred from circumstances, quashing concurrent tribunal orders as perverse.

2 Feb 2026

The dispute involved a writ petition filed by an 84-year-old senior citizen under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging concurrent ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Broker Failed to Prove Client's Liability. Member Client Agreement and Running Account Basis Did Not Shift Burden of Proof to Client Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a petition under Section 34 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Executrix's Suit for Copyright Infringement of Song from Film 'Talash' — Plaintiff Failed to Establish Ownership of Copyright in Cinematographic Film Under Copyright Act, 1957. The court held that the plaintiff, claiming as executrix of the deceased producer, did not prove that the copyright in the song vested in the estate, as the song was composed by a third party and the producer had only commissioned the film.

8 May 2012

The plaintiff, Rupalli P. Shah, claiming to be the executrix of the last Will and testament of O.P. Ralhan (deceased), filed a suit seeking to restrai...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)