Search Results for "delay penalty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "delay penalty"

1474 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1474 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Proceedings in Income Tax Case Due to Delay in Issuance of Notice Under Section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Notice Issued After 8 Years from Filing of Return Held Barred by Limitation.

14 Mar 2006

The applicants, Indian Plywood Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and others, filed income tax returns for the assessment year 1992-93 on 13th September 1992. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Non-Imposition of Penalty Under Workmen's Compensation Act. Penalty under Section 4(A)(3)(b) cannot be imposed without pleading and evidence of unjustifiable delay.

7 Feb 2006

The petitioners, Umarkha Samsherkha and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Benc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Setting Aside of Penalty on Contractors in Government Contract Dispute. Penalty Imposition During Extension of Time Found Impermissible Under Clause 3.5.5(v) of Odisha Public Work Department Code, Volume I, Which Applies Only to Contract Termination Scenarios.

24 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court heard appeals filed by the State of Orissa challenging the High Court's decision to set aside penalties imposed on contractors while...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains MMRDA from Taking Coercive Actions in Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Demand for Construction Delay; Lease Deed Clauses on Time Limit and Additional Built-Up Area Interpreted

20 Nov 2019

The petitioners, Raghuleela Builders Private Limited and Reliance Industries Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Considers Revenue's Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Quashing Penalty Notices Under Section 271DA on Limitation Grounds. Issue Pertains to Interpretation of Section 275 of Income Tax Act in Cases Where Penalty Is to Be Imposed by an Authority Other Than the Assessing Officer.

7 Jul 2026

The appeals arose from orders passed by a single judge of the High Court of Karnataka in ten writ petitions. The respondents, individual assessees and...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Against MMRDA Regarding Levy of Additional Premium on Leasehold Land. Petitioner Assails Demand Notice as Contrary to Lease Agreement and Arbitrary.

8 Apr 2026

The Writ Petition was instituted challenging the Demand Notice dated 9th September 2014 issued by Respondent No.1 – Mumbai Metropolitan Region Devel...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Revenue's Appeal in MVAT Penalty Case — Section 61(2) Does Not Permit Reduction of Penalty Below Statutory Rate. The court held that once a penalty is imposed under Section 61(2) of the MVAT Act, the quantum must be exactly one tenth per cent of total sales, with no discretion to reduce.

15 Sep 2011

The Revenue appealed against a decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal reducing a penalty imposed under Section 61(2) of the Maharashtra Value ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Limitation Case — Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Penalty Under Section 271D Upheld. The Court Held That the Penalty Order Passed by the Range Head Was Barred by Limitation Under Section 275(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the Assessment Order Was Set Aside by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Penalty Was Not Imposed Within the Financial Year.

17 Jan 2025

The Revenue (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Income Tax Officer) filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Penalty Set Aside as Employer Had Not Failed to Deposit Compensation Without Just Cause. Employer's delay in depositing compensation was due to pending insurance claim, not willful default, so penalty under Section 4A(3)(b) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 is not automatic.

21 Dec 2005

The appellant, Ramalu Balkrishna Sagar, owned a truck (MH-31/W-4943) which was involved in an accident on 01.06.2001, resulting in the death of the dr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Penalty Imposed Without Show Cause Notice in Workmen's Compensation Case. Penalty under Section 4A(3)(b) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 Requires Prior Opportunity of Hearing; Interest Under Section 4A(3)(a) is Automatic.

1 Dec 2015

The appellant, Sri Lalitha Equipments, challenged an order of the Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, which imposed a penalty upo...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)