Search Results for "delay in possession"

6 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarified the Scope of Interim Moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 – Held That Regulatory Penalties Imposed by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Are Not Covered

Invoking Insolvency Proceedings Cannot stay execution of Penalty Orders for Consumer Protection Law Violations – The Apex Court Upheld the NCDRC’s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Judgment on Delay in Possession: Balancing Interests of Allottee and Developer "Supreme Court affirms NCDRC's order for refund with interest, recognizing delays from both parties; upholds jurisdiction and considers absence of completion certificate."

The Supreme Court addressed appeals arising from a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) judgment concerning a housing dispute. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Delayed Possession in Fiesta Homes Project. The Supreme Court mandates compensation for homebuyers, correcting NCDRC's oversight of the construction agreement's possession date.

The appellants, along with proforma respondents, filed a complaint against the first respondent-builder for delay in handing over possession of flats ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal Against NCDRC Order on Delayed Flat Possession: Developer's 9% Interest Demand Quashed. Supreme Court overturns NCDRC's direction allowing the developer to charge 9% interest on the balance payment; possession to be handed over within 30 days post-final settlement.

This appeal challenges the final order dated 23rd January 2023 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), which allowed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Consumer's Appeal in Real Estate Dispute, Setting Aside NCDRC Order and Granting Refund with Interest. The court upheld the consumer's right to terminate the agreement due to delay in possession and directed refund as per contractual terms under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the appellants before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) regarding delay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Builder for Refund of Consideration Due to Premature Filing and Lack of Deficiency Proof. Complaint Filed Before Expiry of Contractual Grace Period Under Allotment Terms, and Appellants Failed to Establish Incomplete Work or Delay in Possession Offer.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the appellants against the respondent-company, a builder, alleging deficiency in service due to d...