Search Results for "court fees valuation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "court fees valuation"

493 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 493 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Court Fee Valuation Dispute: Circle Rate Not Conclusive for Market Value Under Section 7(iv-A) of Court Fees Act. The Court held that the market value for court fee purposes must be determined based on pleadings and evidence, not merely the circle rate fixed by the Collector.

19 Feb 2020

The appellant, Agra Diocesan Trust Association, filed two suits (O.S. 24/2013 and O.S. 25/2013) in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Valuation of Suit for Court Fees in Property Dispute. Court holds that where a sale deed is challenged as void ab initio, the plaintiff need not pay ad valorem court fees on the market value of the property, and the suit is properly valued under Section 6(iv)(j) of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

28 Sep 2010

The petitioner, original defendant No.1, challenged the valuation of the suit for the purpose of payment of court fees. The respondents, original plai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Trial Court Order on Valuation and Court Fees in Suit for Share in CIDCO Plots. The court set aside the order directing revaluation and payment of additional court fees as it was passed without any evidence or inquiry.

22 Jun 2012

The petitioners, original defendants in Regular Civil Suit No.61 of 2006, challenged an order dated 5/10/2010 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order on Court Fee Valuation in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. The court held that a suit for declaration that an advertisement claiming possession is illegal, with a consequential injunction, is not a suit for possession and must be valued under Section 6(iv)(j) of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959, not under Section 6(iv)(d).

27 Jun 2014

The petitioner, Shetkari Sahakari Ginning and Pressing Society Limited, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 155 of 2011 before the Civil Judge, Senior Divisi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Against Trial Court's Order on Court Fee in Partition Suit — Section 35(1) of Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. The court held that the trial court must first determine the market value of the suit properties before directing the plaintiff to pay proper court fee.

24 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Anjanappa, filed a suit for partition (O.S.No.808/2008) before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, seeking 1/3rd share i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Taxing Master's Order on Court Fees in Property Suit — Court Fees Must Be Paid on Current Market Value Under Section 5 of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959. Plaintiff's Challenge to Order Directing Payment of Court Fees on Current Market Value Dismissed as Consent Decree in Prior Suit Does Not Affect Court Fee Liability in Subsequent Suit.

24 Jul 2013

The plaintiff, Smt. Hema Valecha, filed a Chamber Summons challenging an order dated 2nd May 2011 passed by the learned Taxing Master of the Bombay Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Objection to Court Fee and Valuation in Suit for Declaration of Title. Court holds that valuation for court fee and jurisdiction under Section 6(iv) of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 is based on market value of property, not plaintiff's share, and that the suit is properly valued.

22 Sep 2010

The petitioners, who are defendants in a civil suit for declaration of title, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Inquiry into Valuation and Court Fees in Suit for Declaration of Sale Deed as Void. Court Held That Section 8 of Maharashtra Court-Fees Act, 1959 Confers Discretion on Trial Court to Inquire into Valuation, Not a Mandatory Duty.

6 Jul 2015

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the plaintiff (respondent No.1) seeking a declaration that a sale deed of suit property is void, illegal, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Court Fee Order in Suit for Declaration that Sale Deed is Null and Void. Court held that a plaintiff who is not the executant of a sale deed and does not seek possession is not liable to pay ad valorem court fee on the value of the property under the Maharashtra Court Fees Act.

5 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Niraj Walle, filed a suit for declaration that a sale deed dated 24th December 2010 is null and void and not binding on him. He is not...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal on Court Fees Computation for Counter Claim in Property Suit — Directs Computation on Appellants' Share Only. Court fees under Section 6(iv)(ha) of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 to be computed on value of property only to extent of appellants' share in counter claim seeking declaration that agreement to assign is void.

15 Oct 2013

The appeal arose from an order of the learned Single Judge dated 1 April 2013 on a Chamber Summons taken out by the appellants to set aside an order o...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)