Search Results for "cotton fabrics"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Commissioner of Customs in Central Excise Case — CESTAT Order Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. Processing of Cotton Fabrics with Aid of Power Without Following Excise Procedures Constitutes Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Rajkot against an order of the Customs, Excise and Servi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Case Due to Non-Compliance with Tribunal's Direction to Furnish Document — Violation of Natural Justice. CESTAT's Order Directing Supply of Letter Dated 20.01.2001 Was Final and Could Not Be Modified Without Proper Justification.

The appellant, a manufacturer of cotton yarn and polyester yarn, was issued two show cause notices dated 11.05.2001 and 02.11.2001 alleging excess sto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Trader's Liability for Excise Duty on Job Work Fabrics Under Rule 12B of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Court Held That the Trader Who Gets Fabrics Manufactured Through Job Workers Is Deemed Manufacturer and Liable for Duty, Not the Job Worker.

The case involves appeals by Dinesh Textiles, a trader who got cotton fabrics and made-ups manufactured through job workers, against the order of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Customs Duty Settlement Case — Upholds Settlement Commission's Rejection for Non-Disclosure. Settlement Commission's Finding of Non-Disclosure of Full Facts Under Section 127C of Customs Act, 1962 Not Interfered With as Not Perverse.

The appellants, including M/s C S India and its partners, filed a writ appeal before the Karnataka High Court challenging the order of a learned Singl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Sales Tax Levy on Steam at 10% — Steam Not a Chemical Under BST Act, 1959. The court held that steam is not a chemical in common parlance and the burden of proof on the assessee was not discharged.

The applicant, M/s Gopalanand Rasayan, a manufacturer of sulphuric acid and other chemicals, generated steam as a byproduct during manufacturing and s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal on Excise Duty Exemption for Cotton Fabrics Produced by Cooperative Society. Interpretation of Exemption Notifications under Rule 8 of Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 at Issue.

The appellant, a textile dealer in Bombay, entered into an agreement with a registered cooperative society for weaving cotton fabrics on powerlooms ow...