Search Results for "conversion premium"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "conversion premium"

89 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Change of User Charges and Premium Calculation — Directs Recalculation Based on Market Value at Time of Application. The court held that the Collector's quantification based on current market value was erroneous and must be based on market value prevalent when the application was made.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Ratilal Madan Waja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging lett...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Premium Paid for FSI Exclusion in Town Planning Case — No Development Commenced, No Benefit Availed. The court held that retention of premium without providing any benefit amounts to unjust enrichment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

17 Nov 2022

The petitioners, Shri Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Smt. Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 February 2020...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Estate Officer's Appeals in Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Dispute Under Consumer Protection Act. The court held that allottees paying conversion fee are consumers under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and the Estate Officer's refusal based on an internal memo without public notification was arbitrary under the Chandigarh Conversion of Residential Leasehold Land Tenure into Freehold Land Tenure Rules, 1996.

7 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from the Estate Officer's refusal to convert leasehold residential plots in Chandigarh to freehold under the Chandigarh Conversion o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Estate Officer's Appeals in Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Cases Under Consumer Protection Act. The court held that conversion of leasehold to freehold property for a fee constitutes a service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and refusal based on an internal memo without public notification is arbitrary, violating statutory rules.

7 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from the Estate Officer's refusal to process applications for converting leasehold residential plots to freehold status under the Ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of MIDC Plot to Auction Purchaser in Winding Up Proceedings — Official Liquidator's Sale Confirmed Despite MIDC's Objection. Court holds that MIDC cannot refuse transfer of property sold by Official Liquidator in company winding up, as the sale is conducted under court supervision and the purchaser steps into the shoes of the company.

21 Aug 2020

The applicant, M/s. Metal Tubes and Rolling Mills, filed a Company Application seeking directions against the Regional Officer, MIDC (Respondent No.2)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CMDA Appeal in Premium FSI Charges Dispute — Guideline Value Prevailing on Date of Approval Governs Levy. Builder's Application for Additional FSI Does Not Confer Right to Pre-Revised Rate.

11 Dec 2019

The appellant, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA), challenged the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court which directe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Conditions for Land Conversion — Land Granted on New and Impartible Tenure Remains Occupancy Class II and Subject to Unearned Income Payment Under Section 29 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

10 Jan 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Niketan Land and Estate Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 24/02/2010 passed by the Collector, Nashik, which allowed the conver...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Conversion Fees Under Goa Land Revenue Code — Application Date Determines Applicable Rate. Conversion fees must be calculated based on rates prevailing on date of application under Section 32 of Goa Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code 1968, not on date of order.

13 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Alvaro Alberto Mousinho de Noronha Ferreira, along with co-owners, applied on 08.03.2013 under Section 32 of the Goa Daman and Diu...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)