Search Results for "conversion date"

1095 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1095 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Santiniketan Construction Case - Appellants Wins Against Demolition Order - High Court's Direction for Demolition and Compensation Set Aside

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Appellants challenging the High Court's order directing demolition of their building in Santiniketan ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Jaipur Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Conversion Charges Refund Case — Land Use Change Required Payment Under Section 173-A of Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959. Court Holds That Conversion Charges Were Validly Demanded and Respondents Not Entitled to Refund.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the Jaipur Municipal Corporation against a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Conditions for Land Conversion — Land Granted on New and Impartible Tenure Remains Occupancy Class II and Subject to Unearned Income Payment Under Section 29 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioner, M/s. Niketan Land and Estate Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 24/02/2010 passed by the Collector, Nashik, which allowed the conver...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Conversion Fees Under Goa Land Revenue Code — Application Date Determines Applicable Rate. Conversion fees must be calculated based on rates prevailing on date of application under Section 32 of Goa Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code 1968, not on date of order.

The petitioner, Dr. Alvaro Alberto Mousinho de Noronha Ferreira, along with co-owners, applied on 08.03.2013 under Section 32 of the Goa Daman and Diu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...