Search Results for "controlling authority"

451 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 451 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Delayed Gratuity Under Section 8 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 — Employer's Dispute Over Quantum Does Not Justify Withholding Payment Beyond Prescribed Period.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order dated 27/02/2017 passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Nagpur, acting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Two Companies Challenging Gratuity Payment Order — Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employee's continuous service under same management entitles him to gratuity despite separate corporate identities.

The petitioners, Varma Industrial Private Limited and IBC Knowledge Park Private Limited, challenged the order dated 31.05.2018 passed by the Assistan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Gratuity Entitlement for Daily Wager Absorbed as Clerk — Continuous Service Counted from Initial Appointment. Municipal Council's contention that daily wage period cannot be counted for gratuity rejected under Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

The Municipal Council, Achalpur, filed a writ petition challenging two concurrent judgments: the order dated 26.06.2015 of the Controlling Authority u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of Delay in Gratuity Appeal — Delay Beyond 120 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Section 7(7) First Proviso Imposes Absolute Bar on Entertaining Appeal Filed After 120 Days from Receipt of Controlling Authority's Order.

The petitioner, Changunabai Sambhaji Gaware, a retired employee, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Industrial Court dated 18.11.2014,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim in Payment of Gratuity Act Case — Resignation Not Ground for Forfeiture. Forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires termination for misconduct causing damage; resignation does not justify forfeiture.

The petitioner, H. Jayarama Shetty, joined the respondent Sangli Bank Ltd. on 28 May 1991. On 3 May 1994, a show cause notice was issued regarding irr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Principal Employer Challenging Gratuity Liability for Contractor's Employees. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Section 7 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Gratuity of Contractor's Workmen When Contractor Fails to Pay.

The petitioner, Cummins (I) Limited, an engineering company, challenged a common order dated 30 May 2003 passed by the Controlling Authority under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to correcting errors apparent on the face of the record, not re-agitating merits.

The case pertains to a review petition filed by M/s National Textile Corporation Ltd. and another (the original respondents) seeking review of a judgm...