Search Results for "concurrent orders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "concurrent orders"

1380 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1380 result(s)

High Court

High Court Sets Aside Registrar's Order Rejecting Trade Mark Application Due to Lack of Reasoning and Failure to Consider Honest Concurrent Use. The Court held that the Registrar's order was unreasoned and ignored material on honest concurrent use under Section 12 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, violating statutory requirements under Sections 18(5) and 91.

23 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a petition filed by Petitioner challenging an order dated 19 May 2025 by the Registrar of Trade Marks, which rejected the petit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Seat of Arbitration Held to be Dubai, UAE, Not India, Based on Express Terms of Distributorship Agreement.

15 Nov 2024

The present petition was filed under Section 11(6)(a) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment o...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

23 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Gauhati High Court Decision Striking Down Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004 for Repugnancy with Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. Diploma in Medicine and Rural Health Care Held to Be a Medical Qualification Requiring Central Permission Under Section 10A of IMC Act.

10 May 2023

The case involves appeals against the Gauhati High Court's judgment striking down the Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004. The Assam Act...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Kidnapping and Rape Case by Ordering Concurrent Running of Sentences. Appellants Convicted Under Sections 363, 366, and 376(1) IPC for Offences Against a Minor, with Sentences Reduced from 22 Years to 10 Years Due to Omission in Sentencing Order and Single Transaction Principle.

25 May 2021

The Supreme Court addressed a criminal appeal concerning the sentencing of appellants convicted for offences under Sections 363, 366, and 376(1) of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Rejection of Section 9 Petition — Interim Relief Granted to Foreign Investor in Shareholder Dispute. Court holds that the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction to decide on interim measures does not preclude the court from granting interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, especially when the tribunal is not yet constituted.

29 Jan 2021

The Appellant, Aniket SA Investments LLC, a foreign investor and shareholder in Respondent No. 1 (Janapriya Engineers Syndicate Private Limited), file...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Power to Fix Higher Sugarcane Price in Conflict Resolution Between Constitution Benches. State Advised Price (SAP) is Valid and Not Repugnant to Central Minimum Price Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

22 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court considered a reference from a three-judge bench regarding an alleged conflict between two Constitution Bench decisions: Ch. Tika Ram...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act as Ultra Vires — State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appeal to Supreme Court. The provision bypassing High Court jurisdiction is invalid for lack of legislative competence under the Constitution.

10 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court considered the validity of Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, which provided for a direct appeal to the Supre...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Declares Section 13(2) of Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011 Ultra Vires for Lack of Legislative Competence. State Legislature Cannot Confer Direct Appellate Jurisdiction on Supreme Court; Provision Invalid.

10 Dec 2019

The case arose from an appeal filed under Section 13(2) of the Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act, 2011, against an eviction order passed by the Rent Contr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds IPAB Order Expunging Trademark 'Creative' for Deceptive Similarity in Travel Services. Petitioner's mark 'Creative Tours & Travels' held deceptively similar to respondent's registered mark 'Creative Travel', causing confusion among consumers under Section 9(2)(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

4 May 2016

The petitioner, Creative Tours & Travels (India) Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)