Search Results for "conceptual similarity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "conceptual similarity"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — 'JAL DROP' Found Deceptively Similar to Registered Mark 'JEEVAN DROP'. The court affirmed that phonetic and conceptual similarity between marks for identical goods (Sodium Hypochlorite Solution) constitutes infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

8 Feb 2016

The respondent, Mauli Chemicals Industries, a registered partnership firm manufacturing Sodium Hypochlorite Solution used as a drinking water disinfec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Defendant for Using Deceptively Similar Trademark 'RABITAL' in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'REVITAL' held to be a well-known coined word, and defendant's mark 'RABITAL' found phonetically and structurally similar, likely to cause confusion.

27 Oct 2005

The plaintiff, Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, a pharmaceutical company, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendant, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — No Deceptive Similarity Between 'Palm Grove' and 'Royal Palms' Hotels. Plaintiff's use of 'Palm Grove' always in combination with 'Ramada' and delay disentitled it to interim relief.

18 Apr 2016

The Plaintiff, Palm Grove Beach Hotels Pvt. Ltd., owned and operated a mid-range hotel in Juhu, Mumbai, under the name 'Ramada Plaza Palm Grove' (prev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Over 'SUKOON' Mark for Ayurvedic Massage Oil. Plaintiff's Prior Use Since 1993 and Distinctive Label Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Defendant's Identical Mark.

26 Oct 2016

The plaintiff, Shafeeque Ahmed Mohammad Sayeed, trading as M/s. Nageena Ayurvedic Pharmacy, filed a suit against the defendant, Ansari Bilal Ahmadlal ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Rules on Custody of US Citizen with Intellectual Disability: Repatriation to US Deemed in Best Interest. Court Emphasizes Best Interests of Child Over Parental Disputes, Upholds Guardianship Order

3 Mar 2025

Best Interests of the Child: The Court emphasized that the welfare and best interests of the child are paramount in custody disputes, especially when...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Reference in Favor of Assessee in Sales Tax Case — Supplies Under Works Contract Not Liable to Tax as Sale. The court held that the transaction for designing, engineering, supplying, erection, installation and commissioning of a project was a works contract and not a sale of goods under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

20 Dec 2017

The case involves a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, made by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal at the instance of M/s. B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Zee Entertainment for Misuse of Confidential TV Show Concept and Copyright Infringement. Plaintiffs established prima facie case of breach of confidence and copyright infringement in concept note for 'Badki Bahu' serial.

25 Mar 2015

The plaintiffs, Beyond Dreams Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, filed a suit against Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. and another for preve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Aerial Distance Certificate for New Sugar Factory — Notification Increasing Distance Not Retrospective. The court held that the Commissioner of Sugar was not required to consider factors beyond aerial distance under Clause 6-B of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966.

5 Dec 2014

The petitioner, a sugar factory registered under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged the order dated 2 July 2011 of the Commissioner of Sugar, Maharas...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)