Search Results for "computational error"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Fresh Acquisition Under 2013 Act Where Land Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation. Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 1894 Act Deemed Lapsed as Award Not Declared and Possession Not Taken, Violating Article 300-A Right to Property.

The petitioner, Roshan Shrikant Tandel, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the acquisition proceedings concerning his land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Section 37 Appeals, Directs Inclusion of Solatium in National Highways Acquisition Awards. Omission of 30% Solatium Held to be a Computational Error Rectifiable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Background: The matters involved a batch of appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards that d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. Court upholds Section 34 order remanding matter for fresh consideration due to misclassification of land and need for evidence.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by M/s. Agrawal Foodstuff LLP against an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Application Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Dispute Centers on Whether Limitation Runs from Original Award or Belated Correction Order When Section 33 Application Filed Beyond 30 Days.

The writ petitions challenged the order of the Commercial Court condoning the delay in filing arbitration suits under Section 34 of the Arbitration an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Corrigendum to Award Does Not Extend Limitation Period for Challenging Original Award

The petitioners, Karuppiah Mahalingam and others, had availed a loan against mortgaged property from Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited. They defaulted on re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Seeking Modification of Interest Award — Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion on Interest Rate and Period Not Interfered With

The Petitioner, IMC Limited (formerly United Storage & Tank Terminals Ltd.), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal Against High Court's Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Dispute Involves Interpretation of Contractual Notice Requirement as Condition Precedent and Applicability of Waiver and Estoppel in EPC Contract.

The dispute arose from multiple Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) agreements between SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation (con...