Search Results for "compromise terms"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "compromise terms"

1387 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1387 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Second Appeal in Agricultural Tenancy Dispute Under Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964. The dispute concerned tenancy rights, deemed purchase, and compromise terms regarding Survey No.1/14 at Paliem, Bardez, Goa.

25 Feb 2021

The judgment concerns a dispute over a property measuring 3000 square metres bearing Survey No.1 Sub Division No.14 of village Paliem, Bardez, Goa. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Between Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos.8-11 in Property Suit — Consent Terms Accepted Despite Objections from Other Defendants. Partial Settlement Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Does Not Affect Rights of Non-Settling Defendants Who May Continue to Contest the Suit.

22 Feb 2024

The suit was filed by 35 plaintiffs seeking a declaration that they are purchasers of certain property. The matter was listed for settlement as the pl...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Dismissing Compromise Petition in Partition Suit — Emphasizes Liberal Approach to Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Trial Court Failed to Examine Genuineness of Compromise and Consent of Parties, Leading to Remand for Fresh Consideration.

8 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Shri K M Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 05.01.2016 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Challenge to Compromise Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — Compromise Not Binding as Plaintiff's Advocate Had No Authority to Enter into Compromise Without Express Consent. The court held that an advocate's implied authority does not extend to compromising a suit without the client's express consent, and the trial court erred in rejecting the plaintiff's application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC.

20 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Ashok Babulal Agrawal, was the original plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No. 29 of 2011 filed in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Divis...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Dismissing Compromise Petition in Civil Suit — Emphasizes Liberal Approach to Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. The court held that a compromise petition should be liberally construed and the trial court's failure to examine the genuineness of the compromise warranted interference under Article 227.

8 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Shri K M Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 05.01.2016 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compromise Order in Municipal Council Service Dispute — President Exceeded Powers Under Maharashtra Municipalities Act. President's Compromise Without Council Resolution and Without Following Statutory Rules Is Invalid and Not Binding on the Council.

6 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Municipal Council Karmala, challenged an order dated 27.3.1997 passed by the Industrial Court, Solapur, which disposed of a complaint ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Interim Application Seeking Decree of Consent Terms in Commercial Appeal. Court Examines Whether Consent Terms Dated 1 November 2023 Are Lawful and Valid for Decree Under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Amidst Allegations of Vagueness, Uncertainty, and Fraud.

19 Jun 2025

Background: The dispute arose from a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) dated 31 October 2020 between applicant no.1, Royal Realtors Landmarks Pvt. Ltd...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Decree-Holder to Enforce Higher Interest Compromise Made in Execution Proceedings. Compromise Amounting to Adjustment of Decree, Recorded Under Order 21 Rule 2 CPC, and Found Fair Held Enforceable.

9 Feb 1968

The dispute arose from a decree passed on compromise on March 24, 1953, directing the respondent to pay Rs.22,500 with 6% interest. After the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Family Dispute Case Due to Compromise Between Parties. Criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 406, 468, 471 read with 34 IPC quashed as parties amicably settled their differences through mediation.

11 Dec 2014

The applicant, Syeda Badar Jahan, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Terms of Compromise in Property Dispute. Decree of Additional District Judge Modified as Per Settlement Between Parties.

12 Jan 2010

This is a second appeal arising from a property dispute. The appellant, Arun s/o Shivaji Naik Virdhe, had filed Second Appeal No. 220 of 1993 in the B...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)