Search Results for "compromise arrangement"

121 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 121 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit Involving Compromise Decree Validity. Dispute pertained to joint family properties and a compromise decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with allegations of sham nature.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court dated 23.11.2011, which had dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit, Upholding High Court's Decree on Property Shares and Invalidating Compromise. Legal Heirs' Dispute Over Ancestral and Self-Acquired Properties Resolved with Shares Determined Under Hindu Law, and Compromise Set Aside Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The litigation originated from a partition suit filed by Charulata Sahoo (plaintiff) against her brother Prafulla Sahoo (defendant No. 1) and sister S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

A legal battle over property ownership spanning decades reaches final resolution, with the Supreme Court setting aside High Court's ruling.

The property dispute involves the execution of a decree for specific performance. The decree stemmed from a compromise between Rehan Ahmed (plaintiff)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Dismissing Compromise Petition in Partition Suit — Emphasizes Liberal Approach to Compromise Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Trial Court Failed to Examine Genuineness of Compromise and Consent of Parties, Leading to Remand for Fresh Consideration.

The petitioner, Shri K M Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 05.01.2016 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Property Dispute Over Compromise Decree Registration. Compromise Decree Arising from Family Settlement Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Under Section 17(2)(vi) of Registration Act, 1908, as Parties Had Pre-existing Rights as Heirs.

The dispute involved two sons of late Vijendra Singh contesting ownership of ancestral land. The appellant filed a suit for possession in 1978, disput...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Recalls Sanction of Demerger Scheme Due to Non-Compliance with Stamp Duty Condition. The court held that failure to pay stamp duty on the order within the prescribed period renders the order liable to be recalled under inherent powers.

The applicants, Unique Delta Force Security Private Ltd. (Resulting Company) and Sumeet Facilities Pvt. Ltd. (Demerged Company), filed applications se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules Against Stamp Duty on Amalgamation Orders Under Companies Act, 1956. Court Order Sanctioning Scheme of Amalgamation Is Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The case involved a reference under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, arising from a scheme of amalgamation between Reliance Industries Limited (transferee)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company Application as Not Maintainable for Lack of Leave Under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956. Applicants Sought Declaration Against Depositors Management Committee Without Prior Approval of Company Court.

The judgment pertains to Company Application No.85 of 2014 filed by six applicants (Shri Kashinath R. Jhunjhunwala and others) against M/s Laxmichand ...