Search Results for "completion of 240 days"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "completion of 240 days"

6 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Appeal by Drivers in MRTU & PULP Act Case, Holding That Regularization Cannot Be Granted When Appellants Have Not Reported for Work Since 2009. The Court Observes That Appellants May Approach Competent Forum Under Section 25H, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and All Issues Remain Open.

24 Aug 2017

The dispute arose from a complaint filed by the appellants, two temporary drivers, before the Industrial Court, Nagpur, alleging unfair labour practic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Reinstatement of Daily Wage Worker in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Petitioner completed 240 days of service and was orally terminated without following Section 25(f) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

16 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Tanaji Baburao Tanugade, filed a complaint under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 alleging unfair labour practice by the Kolhapur District Ce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition in EGS Termination Case. Project-Based Employment Under Employment Guarantee Scheme Does Not Confer Right to Regularisation Despite Completion of 240 Days.

8 Oct 2015

The State of Maharashtra and its officers (petitioners) challenged the judgments of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which had held that the term...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition in EGS Watchman Termination Case — Project-Based Employment Does Not Confer Permanent Status. Completion of 240 days under Employment Guarantee Scheme does not create a right to permanency or protection under Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

8 Oct 2015

The State of Maharashtra and its officers filed a writ petition challenging the judgments of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which had held that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Contractual Watchmen Entitled to Permanent Status After 240 Days of Work. The court held that the employer committed unfair labour practices under Items 6, 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act by failing to confer permanent status on watchmen who completed 240 days of work and by terminating them illegally.

22 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., a statutory body under the Indian Electricity Supply Act, 1948, challenged an ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Forest Worker's Petition for Permanent Employment - No Right to Regularisation in Absence of Sanctioned Posts and Scheme-Based Employment. Completion of 240 days does not automatically confer permanency under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

17 Oct 2005

The petitioner, Navnath Maruti Chavan, was employed as a forest worker in the Forest Department of Maharashtra from 13th July 1995. He alleged that de...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)