Search Results for "collateral purpose"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Eviction Suit on Grounds of Bonafide Requirement under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Landlord’s Right to Evict Tenant for Bonafide Requirement Upheld – Unregistered Rent Agreement Not a Bar to Eviction

Bonafide Requirement – The landlord (Plaintiff) sought eviction of the tenant (Defendant) on the grounds of bonafide requirement under Section 16(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashed Appellate Order, Restored Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit. Bombay High Court held that an unregistered Agreement for Sale is admissible as evidence in a suit for specific performance and reversed the appellate court’s decision denying temporary injunction.

A discretionary order granting a temporary injunction should not be interfered with unless it is arbitrary or perverse (Wander Ltd. vs. Antox India P....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The Court held that the plaint disclosed triable issues regarding mortgage, power of attorney revocation, and jurisdiction, and could not be rejected at the threshold.

The appellant, Vinod Infra Developers Ltd., claimed ownership of agricultural land in Jodhpur and alleged that it had borrowed Rs. 7.5 crores from res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Legal Resolution in Family Property Dispute: Upholding the Partition Based on Conduct and Documents" "Estoppel by Conduct and the Validity of Unregistered Documents in Hindu Joint Family Property Cases"

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, dismissed the appeal filed by the plaintiffs, confirming that the first appellate court correctly reversed the tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...