Search Results for "closure not business closure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "closure not business closure"

633 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 633 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Employer's Appeal; Distinguishes Closure from Lock-Out Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Genuine Closure Found; Workmen Entitled to Compensation Under Section 25FFF Main Clause, Not Limited to Three Months' Pay.

27 Oct 1969

The dispute concerned the closure of the Jamshedpur unit of Tatanagar Foundry Co. Ltd., a company with establishments in West Bengal and Bihar. On Nov...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Closure of Shipping Company Office. Labour Court's Finding of Genuine Closure Upheld; No Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 1(b) and 1(d) of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

28 Aug 2006

The case involves a writ petition filed by Lionel Edward & India Steamship Employees Union challenging the dismissal of their complaint of unfair labo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Closure of Textile Mills Under Section 250 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Reinstatement of Retrenched Workers Denied Due to Financial Non-Viability. Closure Application Approved by Appropriate Government and Industrial Tribunal; Retrenchment Compensation Paid; No Justification for Reopening or Reinstatement.

9 Jun 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Standard Mills (Textile Division of Standard Industries Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, had been in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Bajaj Electricals Ltd, Upholds Closure of Diecasting Division as Genuine. Industrial Court's finding of functional integrality between diecasting and fan divisions reversed; closure held valid under Section 25O of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

3 Jul 2018

The Petitioner, Bajaj Electricals Limited, had a factory at Chakan, Pune, comprising two divisions: a diecasting division and a fan division. The diec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Closure Permission for Textile Mills Under Section 25-O of Industrial Disputes Act. The Court Stresses Need for Genuine and Adequate Grounds and Balances Industrial Needs with Worker Welfare, While Exercising Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

21 Feb 2005

The dispute arose from the closure of two textile establishments, the Crown Mills Division and Process House Unit of Hindustan Spinning and Weaving Mi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workmen's Appeal in Industrial Closure Dispute — Upholds Validity of Closure and Rejection of Retrenchment Compensation Claims. Workmen's claim for retrenchment compensation under Section 25FFF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 fails as closure was valid and workmen had already accepted dues.

24 Jun 2010

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 3146 of 2004. The ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal Award Declaring Closure Illegal in Industrial Disputes Act Case — Re-employment and Backwages Granted to Retrenched Workmen. Closure of Factory Without Prior Permission Under Section 25-O of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal as Establishment Employed More Than 100 Workmen.

13 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Global Health Care Products, a registered partnership firm manufacturing toothpaste in Dapada, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, closed its fact...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Setting Aside Retrenchment as Unfair Labour Practice. Employer Failed to Prove Genuine Closure, Retrenchment of 23 Workmen Without Complying with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

18 Dec 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Sanket Food Products Pvt. Ltd., challenged the judgments of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which held that the retrenchmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Interim Relief in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint — Closure of Factory by Employer Held Not Prima Facie Illegal Despite Assurance to Employees. The Court held that the Industrial Court misapplied the tests for interim relief under Section 30(2) of the MRTU & PULP Act, as closure is a right of the employer and the assurance regarding a different unit did not make the closure illegal.

9 Aug 2018

The Petitioner, Viraj Engineering Company, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing engineering components, decided to close its factory on 9 March...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of RBI COVID-19 Moratorium Package. Petitioner Challenges Banks' Denial of Moratorium Under RBI Circular Dated 27.03.2020.

8 Jul 2020

Velankani Information Systems Limited, a company operating an IT park and a five-star hotel in Bengaluru, availed term loans aggregating Rs. 475 crore...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)