Search Results for "clarificatory notification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "clarificatory notification"

97 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Excise Incentive Withdrawal Case — Policy Change Upheld as Prospective and in Public Interest. The Court held that the impugned notification was not retrospective and promissory estoppel did not bar the government from modifying the incentive scheme for Kutch industries.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Union of India against the common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had quashed Notificatio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NGT Order Quashing Environmental Clearance for Peripheral Ring Road Due to Stale EIA Data. Primary Data Collected Over Three Years Before Submission Invalidates Clearance Under EIA Notification 2006.

17 Mar 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated 8 February 2019 quashing the Environmental Clearance (EC) granted to the B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Gujarat Sales Tax Act Case Due to No Breach of Exemption Conditions and Application of Promissory Estoppel. The assessee was entitled to exemption under Entry No.255(2) of Notification dated 05.03.1992 as raw materials were used in the eligible unit, and subsequent amendments did not retroactively impose liabilities, upholding the principle of promissory estoppel under Section 49(2) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969.

21 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from the State of Gujarat's appeal against the High Court's dismissal of its tax appeals, which upheld the Gujarat Value Added Tax T...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of 100% EOU in Customs Duty Case for Unauthorized DTA Sales of Cut Flowers. Cut Flowers Held Non-Excisable, Duty Leviable on Inputs Under Notification No. 126/94-Cus as Amended, Extended Limitation Period Invoked for Wilful Suppression.

1 Sep 2020

The appeal arises from a dispute between M/s. L.R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in floriculture, and the Commis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case — Clarificatory Notification Must Be Considered by State Authorities. The Court held that the State cannot deny exemption based on date of import when a clarificatory notification extends the benefit, and the State must act fairly and be aware of its own notifications.

23 Jan 2020

The appellant, M/s. Granules India Ltd., imported 96 tons of Acetic Anhydride under three Bills of Entry in December 1993 through the Inland Water Con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Scrutiny Committee's Verification of OBC Caste Certificate. Caste Certificate of Kharvi Community Member Upheld After Enquiry, No Ground for Interference.

4 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Krishna Dhakhu Pilernekar, contested the election for Village Panchayat, Merces from Ward No.8 against a seat reserved for OBC candida...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Principal Qualification Dispute — Ph.D Not Mandatory Under AICTE Regulations. Court Holds That 2010 AICTE Regulations Provide Alternate Qualifications for Principal Post, and State Rules Providing for Appointment Without Ph.D Are Not Ultra Vires.

18 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the High Court of Chhattisgarh's order quashing promotions of seven appellants to the post of Principal i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

6 Dec 2019

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)