Search Results for "claimant"

4472 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4472 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench Disposes of Multiple Motor Accident Claims Appeals under Section 173(1) of MV Act. The appeals arose from awards of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal concerning compensation for injuries and deaths in road accidents.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench heard a batch of miscellaneous first appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Addresses Court Fees in Motor Vehicle Accident Appeals Under Maharashtra Court Fees Act. Claimants Who Are Neither Insurer nor Owner Contend They May Restrict Appeal Valuation and Pay Only Half Ad Valorem Court Fees; Taxing Officer Demands Full Fee on Enhanced Claim Difference.

The dispute arose from office objections requiring deficit court fees from appellants who filed appeals against awards of Motor Accident Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Settlement Under Own Policy Bars Further Recovery. Claimant who accepted full and final settlement from his own insurer cannot claim compensation from the opposite insurer for the same damage under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), North Goa, Panaji, dated 18.11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Gratuitous Passenger in Goods Vehicle Not Entitled to Compensation. Claimant traveling as gratuitous passenger in goods vehicle cannot be considered owner of goods; insurer not liable under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves an appeal by United India Insurance Company Ltd. against the award of compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Palghar, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal by MSRTC in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Award Upheld as Just and Proper. Claimant's Income Assessed at Rs. 3,000 per month and Future Prospects Added at 40% Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by the Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenging the judgment and award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Cannot Claim Against Himself. Claim by Mother of Deceased Maintainable as She is a Legal Representative Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the insurance company under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 23.10.201...